SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 9791

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
JITENDRAKUMAR AMBALAL KONDIV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT


IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (FOR MAINTENANCE) NO. 624 of

2014 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR ==========================================================

Approved for Reporting Yes No ==========================================================

JITENDRAKUMAR AMBALAL KONDI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

==========================================================

Appearance:

ADVOCATE NOTICE SERVED for the Applicant(s) No. 1 BELABEN M NAYAK(7722) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4 MR BHUNESH C RUPERA(3896) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4 MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 06/04/2026

JUDGMENT

1. It is required to be noted that on 31.07.2025, an advocate's notice was issued to the applicant, as his earlier advocate had been appointed as a Public Prosecutor. Though served, none appears for the applicant. Therefore, it clearly appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the present matter. Hence, in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Taj Mohammad v. State

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top