2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 10002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
RUPAIBEN JETHABHAI CHAVDAV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
R/SCA/4524/2026
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/4524/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/04/2026
0.23796917077594193
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4524 of 2026
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK Sd/-
==========================================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No No ==========================================================
RUPAIBEN JETHABHAI CHAVDA Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR HARDIK D MUCHHALA(5634) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MS NIRALI SARDA AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK Date : 02/04/2026
JUDGMENT
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. The learned AGP Ms. Nirali Sarda, waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of the respective parties,
the matter is taken up for final hearing today.
2. By the present Writ Petition, the petitioner is praying for a direction to the respondent No.2 - Mamlatdar & Executive Magistrate, Maliya Hatina, Dist. Junagadh to issue Schedule Tribe Certificate in the prescribed format as required by the Central Government for GDS
recruitment in various post office.
3. The learned counsel Mr. Hardik D. Muchhala appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner belongs to Rabari Caste, which is a Scheduled Tribe Category. He submits that the petitioner has already been
Page 1 of 3 Uploaded by SURESH SOLANKI(HC00208) on Mon Apr 06 2026 Downloaded on : Fri Apr 10 15:10:23 IST 2026
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/4524/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/04/2026
0.23796917077594193
issued the caste certificate by the competent authority on 21.03.2017. He submits that the petitioner had applied for GDS recruitment in Postal Department and upon selection, she was called for document verification. The learned counsel submits that the recruitment officer instructed the petitioner to submit the caste certificate in English in the prescribed format of Central Government as per the notification. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner, accordingly, made an application dated 12.03.2026 to the respondent No.2 Mamlatdar & Executive Magistrate, for issuing the Schedule Tribe Certificate in the prescribed format. The learned counsel submits that the said application is pending consideration before the respondent No.2. He submits that appropriate directions are required to be passed. He submits that if the said certificate is not issued to the petitioner, the
petitioner will lose her job.
4. The learned AGP Ms. Nirali Sarda, appearing for the respondent authorities submits that the petitioner has already been issued the caste certificate. She submits that if the application of the petitioner is pending consideration for issuance of caste certificate in the prescribed format, then appropriate orders may be
passed.
5. Considered the submissions and perused the documents on record. To secure the job in Postal
Page 2 of 3 Uploaded by SURESH SOLANKI(HC00208) on Mon Apr 06 2026 Downloaded on : Fri Apr 10 15:10:23 IST 2026
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/4524/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/04/2026
0.23796917077594193
Department, the petitioner is required to submit the caste certificate issued by the competent authority in the prescribed format as required by the Central Government and the same should be in English language. The petitioner has accordingly made an application to the respondent No.2 on 12.03.2026. In view thereof, the respondent No.2 Mamlatdar, is hereby directed to decide the application of the petitioner dated 12.03.2026 and issue the caste certificate to the petitioner in the prescribed format as required by the Central Government for securing the job in Postal Department. It is submitted that the prescribed format has already been annexed with the application made by the petitioner to the respondent
No.2.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the present Special Civi