SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Guj) 946

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M. R. MENGDEY, J.
Abc - Applicant
Versus 
State Of Gujarat & Anr. – Respondents
R/Special Criminal Application (Direction) No. 4889 of 2026  
Decided On : 13-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Ms. Bhavna D. Acharya
For the Respondents: Mr Hardik Soni, APP

Reproductive choice, including the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy resulting from sexual assault, is a fundamental component of the right to personal liberty and dignity. Courts may authorize such terminations beyond standard temporal limits when supported by medical opinion to safeguard the mental and physical well-being of survivors.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Right to reproductive choice - Bodily autonomy and dignity - Termination of pregnancy for survivors of sexual assault. Reproductive choice is an essential facet of personal liberty and human dignity under the Constitution. In cases of sexual assault, the anguish caused by an unwanted pregnancy is presumed to constitute grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant individual. Courts are empowered to permit pregnancy termination beyond standard chronological thresholds when medically safe and in the best interests of the survivor. (Paras 10, 11, 12, 13)

(B) Medical Board - Role and functions - Professional opinion on gestational safety - Scientific collection of evidence. When a medical board determines that a pregnancy termination is clinically safe, the court may authorize the procedure to prevent prolonged mental agony. If the pregnancy exceeds the usual temporal limit, specialized medical assessment is essential to confirm the feasibility and minimize risks to the individual. Direction for collecting tissue samples for scientific identification during the medical procedure balances the rights of the survivor with the needs of the judicial process. (Paras 14, 15)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, a survivor of sexual assault, sought judicial intervention to terminate a pregnancy of approximately 21 weeks and 6 days. Due to the psychological trauma and the origins of the pregnancy arising from a violation of her bodily integrity, she requested a medically supervised termination. The medical board confirmed that the procedure could be performed without compromising the applicant's physical health.

Findings of Court:
The court found that forcing a survivor of sexual violence to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term would violate her right to live with dignity. Emphasizing the "best interest" of the survivor, the court determined that the medical opinion provided sufficient justification for the procedure. The court also balanced the survivor's rights with the investigative necessity of DNA sampling.

Issues: The main issues were the assessment of the survivor's mental health regarding an unwanted pregnancy arising from sexual assault, the determination of clinical safety for termination beyond 20 weeks, and the harmonization of reproductive rights with investigative evidence requirements.

Ratio Decidendi: reproductive rights, including the choice to terminate a pregnancy resulting from sexual assault, are a fundamental aspect of the right to personal liberty and bodily integrity. The court acts as a facilitator for these rights, ensuring that legal or temporal constraints do not supersede the necessity of preventing irreversible mental harm and preserving the dignity of the survivor, provided that medical standards for safety are satisfied.

Result: Petition allowed; medical termination of pregnancy permitted under clinical supervision.

Table of Content
1. factual basis regarding the rape victim's pregnancy and medical board evaluation. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 7 , 8)
2. parties' contentions and request for dna preservation during termination. (Para 5 , 9 , 11)
3. judicial precedents emphasizing reproductive choice and mental health of sexual assault victims. (Para 10 , 12)
4. court's directive allowing termination based on the victim's best interests and medical safety. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)

ORDER :

M. R. MENGDEY, J.

1. The present application has been preferred by the applicant-victim under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India along with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 as well as under the provisions of the Medical Termination of the Pregnancy Act, 1971, for a direction to the respondent authority to terminate the pregnancy of the applicant-victim who is aged about 19 years, at the earliest, which is in the best interest of the victim considering her physical health and incident of rape causing grave injury to her mental health.

2. On 09.04.2026, this Court passed the following order :-

“1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the victim of the offence of rape and because of the incident, she has attained pregnancy and presently, she is carrying the pregnancy of 21 weeks and 2 days. She is not desirous of continuing with the said pregnancy and therefore, wants the same to be terminated medically.

2. Having regard to the same, the team of the doctors at Sola Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad headed by the Head of the Department-Gynecology and other panel doctors shall examine the petitioner for termination of pregnancy and give their opinion with regard to the risk factor involved in medical termination of pregnancy. The examination of the petitioner shall take place on 10.04.2026. The report of examination shall be submitted before this Court on 13.04.2026.

3. It is also made clear that if the petitioner requires any other treatment, the hospital authorities shall look into the same and provide the necessary treatment to her.

4. S.O. to 13.04.2026. Direct Service permitted, today.”

4. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 09.04.2026, the learned APP received a report from the GMERS Medical College and Hospital, Sola, Ahmedabad (Medical Board for Pregnancy Termination) dated 10.4.2026. On perusing the report, it appears that after examining the applicant-victim, the doctors from different branches/ departments found the applicant-victim in good health and carrying a single live intrauterine fetus with gestational age of 21 weeks 06 days. Therefore, they have opined that since the applicant-victim is carrying a live fetus of 21 weeks and 06 days, medical termination of pregnancy can be performed as per the guidelines of the MTP Amendment Act, 2021.

5. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties and considered the opinion/report submitted by the GMERS Medical College and Hospital, Sola, Ahmedabad (Medical Board for Pregnancy Termination) dated 10.04.2026, as well as the written submission by the respondent no.1 - State.

7. On hearing both the sides, this Court has noticed that the applicant-victim is alleged to have been raped by the accused.

8. A panel of doctors have opined that the applicant-victim is already carrying about 21 weeks and 06 days of pregnancy with a specific report/opinion of the empaneled doctors that medical termination of pregnancy can be performed as per the guidelines of the MTP Amendment Act, 2021.

9. Learned APP has urged before this Court that the Court may, in a given set of circumstances, issue a direction for termination of pregnancy. However, the tissues from the fetus may be directed to be handed over for the purpose of DNA sampling in a scientific manner to the Investigating Officer.

10. In the case of X vs. Union of India and Another (Miscellaneous Application No.2157 of 2023 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.1137 of 2023), the Hon’ble Supreme Court has summarised t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top