##PAGE1##

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/17634/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 17/04/2026

0.09191940136579824

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17634 of 2025

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK

==========================================

Approved for Reporting Yes No ✔

==========================================

MAHESHKUMAR MANGALDAS PRABHAKAR Versus

THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE AHMEDABAD & ANR.

==========================================

Appearance:

KAIVAN M DASTOOR(9322) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR PRADIP D BHATE(1523) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2

==========================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK

Date : 17/04/2026

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. RULE returnable forthwith. Learned Standing Counsel waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents.

2. With the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties, the present petition is taken up for hearing.

3. Present petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under the provisions of the Passport Act

Page 1 of 7 Uploaded by V.R. PANCHAL(HC00171) on Fri Apr 17 2026 Downloaded on : Fri Apr 17 17:05:58 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/17634/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 17/04/2026

0.09191940136579824

seeking direction to respondent – passport authority to issue passport for a period of 10 years to the petitioner and to decide the application

preferred by the petitioner.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel Standing Counsel for the respondents - authorities.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that under the prevalent rules of the GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993, the respondent authority has to renew the passport of the petitioner for a period of 10 years. He has submitted that as the validity of the petitioner’s passport was expired, the petitioner had applied for renewal of the passport for the period of 10 years, however, the respondent has not renewed the passport on the ground that the criminal case is pending and he is yet not charge sheeted in the offences. He has submitted that the petitioner has to travel to abroad but due to non-renewal of the passport, he is not able to visit. He has, therefore, submitted that appropriate direction be passed since the

petitioner is well settled and has no intention of absconding.

5.1 Learned counsel for the petitioner in support of his submissions has relied upon the judgment of the Division Bench of Bombay High Court reported in 2014 SCC Online Bom 356 Narendra K. Ambwani Vs. Union of India & Ors. wherein the Bombay High Court has issued guidelines to be followed by the passport authorities where the Trial Court has directed that the passport may be renewed

as per the rules.

6. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents has

Page 2 of 7 Uploaded by V.R. PANCHAL(HC00171) on Fri Apr 17 2026 Downloaded on : Fri Apr 17 17:05:58 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/17634/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 17/04/2026

0.09191940136579824

submitted that the passport of the petitioner has been renewed from time to time in terms of the GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993. He submits that where the order of the Trial Court grants permission to travel abroad for a period of less than 1 year but does not specify the period, the passport has to be renewed only for 1 year. He submits that in view of said Notification, the passport authorities have issued the passport as per the rules and the prevalent notifications. He submits that, however, there is no restriction on this Court to issue a direction for issuance of the passport for a certain period of validity as per the rules. He, therefore, submits that

appropriate directions be passed accordingly.

7. Considered the submissions and perused the documents on record.

8. The GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993 reads as under:-

G.S.R 570 (E)-In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of the Section 22