SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Guj) 1098

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M.R. MENGDEY, J.
 
Victim Nikita Since Minor Thro. Guardian Manjuben Indrachand Bhargav - Applicant
Versus 
State Of Gujarat & Ors. – Respondents
R/Special Criminal Application (Direction) No. 4895 of 2026
Decided On : 13-04-2026 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Shriram K. Bhargaw
For the Respondents: Mr Hardik Soni, APP.

The right to terminate a pregnancy resulting from sexual assault is an essential component of individual bodily autonomy and personal liberty under the Constitution. Medical termination is permissible when the continuation of such pregnancy poses a threat to the physical or mental health of the survivor.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Right to reproductive choice - Bodily integrity - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 and Amendment Act, 2021 - Sections 3 and 4 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 528. Right of a woman to have reproductive choice is an inseparable part of personal liberty under Article 21. Forcing a victim of sexual assault to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term may cause grave injury to mental health and violate the dignity of the victim. (Paras 10, 11, 12).

(B) Medical termination - Pregnancy caused by sexual assault - Presumption of grave mental injury - Where pregnancy results from sexual violence, statutes recognize the anguish caused as a grave injury to mental health, permitting termination under the law. (Paras 10, 12, 13).

(C) DNA sampling - Mandatory procedural requirement - Courts, while permitting termination in cases of sexual assault, must ensure that fetal tissue is preserved and handed over to investigative agencies for scientific DNA identification. (Paras 9, 15).

Facts of the case:
A minor victim of sexual assault filed an application seeking judicial permission for the medical termination of a pregnancy. The court ordered a medical evaluation by a specialized board, which assessed the victim's physical health and the gestation period of the pregnancy within the statutory limits for termination.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that in view of the victim's age, the traumatic circumstances of the conception, and the medical opinion provided, the termination was in the best interest of the victim’s health and dignity, weighing the reproductive autonomy of the survivor against the potential for ongoing mental suffering.

Issues: Whether a minor victim of sexual assault should be granted judicial permission to terminate an unwanted pregnancy despite the emotional and social trauma involved; and what procedural safeguards are required to preserve evidence from the fetal tissue for ongoing criminal investigations.

Ratio Decidendi: Reproductive choice is an essential aspect of personal liberty and bodily integrity under the Constitution. Termination is legally permissible where pregnancy is the result of sexual violence, as the physical and mental trauma constitutes grave injury under statutory health grounds. Preservation of fetal tissue for investigation is required to balance restorative reproductive rights with the interests of criminal justice.

Result: Application allowed with specific directions to medical and investigative authorities.

Table of Content
1. factual background and medical status regarding pregnancy termination request. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8)
2. legal precedents and statutory framework for medical termination of pregnancy. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. application of 'best interest' doctrine for judicial intervention. (Para 13 , 14)
4. final operative directions and procedural safeguards for the procedure. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

ORDER :

M.R. MENGDEY, J.

1. The present application has been preferred by the applicant-victim under Article 226 of the Constitution of India along with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 as well as under the provisions of the Medical Termination of the Pregnancy Act, 1971, in connection with the complaint submitted to the Police Inspector, Sabarmati Police Station, Ahmedabad City, for a direction to the respondent authority to terminate the pregnancy of the applicant-victim who is aged about 17 years, at the earliest, which is in the best interest of the victim considering her physical health and incident of rape causing grave injury to her mental health.

2. On 09.042026, this Court passed the following order :-

“1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner herein is aged about 17 years and is the victim of the offence of rape and because of the same, she had attained pregnancy which she is not desirous of continuing with and wants the same terminated medically.

2. Having regard to the same, the team of the doctors at Sola Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad headed by the Head of the Department-Gynecology and consisting other expert doctors shall examine the petitioner for termination of pregnancy and give their opinion with regard to the risk factor involved in medical termination of pregnancy. The examination of the petitioner shall take place on 10.04.2026. The report of examination shall be submitted before this Court on 13.04.2026.

3. S.O. to 13.04.2026. Direct Service permitted, today.”

4. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 09.04.2026, the learned APP received a report from the GMERS Medical College and Hospital, Sola, Ahmedabad (Medical Board for Pregnancy Termination) dated 13.04.2026. On perusing the report, it appears that after examining the applicant-victim, the doctors from different branches/ departments found the applicant-victim in good health and carrying a single intrauterine early pregnancy of 05 weeks 06 days. Therefore, they have opined that since the applicant-victim is carrying an early pregnancy of 05 weeks and 06 days, medical termination of pregnancy can be performed as per the guidelines of the MTP Amendment Act, 2021.

5. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties and considered the opinion/report submitted by the GMERS Medical College and Hospital, Sola, Ahmedabad (Medical Board for Pregnancy Termination) dated 13.04.2026, as well as the written submission by the respondent no.1 - State.

7. On hearing both the sides, this Court has noticed that the applicant-victim is alleged to have been raped by the accused named in the complaint submitted before the Police Inspector, Sabarmati Police Station, Ahmedabad City.

8. A panel of doctors have opined that the applicant-victim is already carrying about 05 weeks of pregnancy with a specific report/opinion of the empaneled doctors that medical termination of pregnancy can be performed as per the guidelines of the MTP Amendment Act, 2021.

9. Learned APP has urged before this Court that the Court may, in a given set of circumstances, issue a direction for termination of pregnancy. However, the tissues from the fetus may be directed to be handed over for the purpose of DNA sampling in a scientific manner to the Investigating Officer.

10. In the case of X vs. Union of India and Another (Miscellaneous Application No.2157 of 2023 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.1137 of 2023), the Hon’ble Supreme Court has summarised the law regarding the medical termination of pregnancies. In paragraph-13, the Hon’ble Supreme

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top