Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Nikhil S. Kariel, J
Rakshit Ravish Chorasiya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural context for a regular bail application after charge-sheet filing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. judicial assessment of bail factors including age, custody duration, and gravity of offences. (Para 7) |
| 3. imposition of conditional release and judicial caution regarding trial influence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Bhadrish Raju with learned advocate Mr.Shaishav Pandit appearing on behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.Jay Mehta appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.
1.1. Learned advocate Mr.Moulesh A. Vyas submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the original complainant and that he may be permitted to file his Vakalatnama. Permission is granted.
2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.
3. The applicant has filed this application under Section
483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11196027250115/2025 registered with Karelibaug Police Station, Vadodara City for the offence punishable under Sections 105, 281, 125(a), 125(b), 324(5), 54 of the BNS
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
