Modification of Order dtd.

0.9413788178332327 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (REGULARIZED DAY OF LATE SURRENDER) NO. 4736 of 2026 [On Office Note in order dated 09/04/2026 in R/SCR.A/4736/2026 ]

================================================

NASIRBHAI AMIRULLA ANSARI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

================================================

Appearance:

MS. AARTI R. MISTRY(18822) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL Date : 21/04/2026

ORAL ORDER

1. The matter is notified on an Office Note in order dated 09.04.2026 passed in the captioned petition.

2. Having regard to the Office Note as well as the order dated 09.04.2026, the Office Note is being disposed of with an observation that in paragraph 2, in second line, of the said order, the word “already”

shall be omitted.

3. Registry to issue fresh writ, if any, accordingly.

[ P. M. Raval, J. ]

hiren/30tss21426

0.9413788178332327 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (REGULARIZED DAY OF LATE SURRENDER) NO. 4736 of 2026 ==================================================

NASIRBHAI AMIRULLA ANSARI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

==================================================

Appearance:

MS. AARTI R. MISTRY(18822) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MONALI BHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL Date : 09/04/2026

ORAL ORDER

1. Present petition is filed by the applicant seeking regularization of period of late surrender after his release on parole by virtue of an order dated 15.03.2023 passed in Special Criminal Application No. 3245 of 2023, which was extended by an order dated

06.04.2023.

2. A perusal of the jail remarks reveals that jail punishment for such a default is already yet to be imposed by the competent authority.

3. Accordingly, this petition is hereby disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner, as observed by the Division Bench of this Court in the decision rendered in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1360 of 2014 in Criminal Appeal No. 2884 of 2008 dated 04.02.2014, to move the concerned jail authority seeking

0.9413788178332327 condonation of such delay in surrendering and directing the authority concerned to decide such an application, if preferred, in accordance with law.

(P. M. RAVAL, J)

MOHD SAIF ULLAH