SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 13233

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Gita Gopi, J
LAGDHIRBHAI ARJANBHAI DESAIV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION - NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 2114 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shloka Pandya
For the Respondents: Pranav Dhagat, Karan Y Vyas

The court modified a previous order through a 'Speaking to Minutes' application to correctly record the total settlement amount of Rs. 2,20,000 and direct its disbursement to the complainant in a Negotiable Instruments Act matter.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure - Speaking to Minutes - Modification of Order - Correction of previous order to accurately reflect the settlement amount deposited by the applicant and the direction for disbursement to the complainant. (Para 2, 3)

Issues: Whether the order dated 23.04.2026 required modification to correctly record the settlement terms and disbursement instructions.

Table of Content
1. modification of a judicial order to correctly record settlement terms and disbursement of funds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)

ORDER

1. Perused the Note for Speaking to Minutes.

2. Paragraph 4 of the order dated 23.04.2026 in the said application be read as under :-

“4. Learned advocate for respondent no.2–original complainant Mr. Karan Y. Vyas has placed on record the afÏdavit of settlement filed by the respondent no.2– original complainant-Thakor Rameshchandra Baldevbhai and stated that the applicant had deposited before the concerned Court, an initial amount of Rs.44,000/- on 21.03.2025 and further an amount of Rs.1,76,000/- has been deposited before the concerned Court as full and final settlement. It is further submitted that the total cheque amount is of Rs.2,20,000/-. It is urged that the above amount/s be handed over to the complainant as full and final settlement. The complainant does not want to pursue the matter now in view of amicable settlement and has given consent for compounding the offence. The same is taken on record. The respondent no.2 has afÏrmed the contents of the afÏdavit and is identified by learned advocate for respondent no.2.”

3. Paragraph 7 of the order dated 23.04.2026 in the said application be read as under :-

“7. In view of the above, the concerned Court is directed to disburse the amount/s deposited by the applicant to the complainant-Thakor Rameshchandra Baldevbhai on proper verification of the identity.”

4. Rest of the order dated 23.04.2026 remains unaltered. Fresh writ be issued accordingly.

5. The Note for Speaking to Minutes stands disposed of. Direct Service is permitted.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top