SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 13635

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M. K. Thakker, J
MAHESBHAI DHIRUBHAI DANGARV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
R/CR.MA/2852/2021 | CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR AMENDMENT) NO. 1 of 2026 In R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 2852 of 2021 | R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 2781 of 2021 | CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR AMENDMENT) NO. 1 of 2026 In R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 2781 of 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Bhanukumar B Agrawal
For the Respondents: Ronak Rawal, Jimit Shah

The court may quash FIRs under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if the dispute is private in nature and the parties have reached a settlement, as continuing such proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law.

Headnote:(A) Quashment of FIR - Settlement between parties - Where the dispute is private in nature and the complainant consents to the quashment of the FIR, continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law and unnecessary harassment to the applicant. (Para 6)

Issues: Whether the FIRs can be quashed based on the settlement and consent of the complainant in a private dispute.

Table of Content
1. procedural steps and parties' mutual consent for quashment of firs in a private dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. legal reasoning for quashing firs based on settlement and avoidance of abuse of process. (Para 6)
3. final judicial order quashing the impugned firs and consequential proceedings. (Para 7)

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned advocate Mr.Jimit Shah, appearing for the complainant, is permitted to file his vakalatnama. Registry is directed to accept the same.

2. The present applications are filed for quashment of the FIRs being CR No.11198047210090/2021 and 11198047210091/2021 both registered at Shihor Police Station, Bhavnagar.

3. Learned advocate Mr.Bhanukumar Agrawal submits that the present disputes are pertaining to Gujarat Land Grabbing Act and now the applicant has vacated the premises in that background their consent of complainant is given for quashment of the FIR.

4. Learned advocate Mr.Jimit Shah, appearing for the complainant, has supported the contention of the learned advocate for the applicant and submitted that the complainant has also filed an affidavit reiterating the above aspect.

5. This Court has noted the presence of the complainant and referred the affidavits filed by the complainant which is ordered to be taken on record.

6. Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, considering the facts and circumstances arising out of the present application as well as taking into consideration the decisions rendered by the Apex Court in the cases of ‘Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.’, reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, ‘ Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab ’, reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, ‘Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.’, reported in 2009 (1) GLH 31, ‘Manoj Sharma Vs. State & Ors.’, reported in 2009 (1) GLH 190 and ‘Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.’, reported in 2014 (2) Crime 67 (SC), it appears that further continuation of criminal proceedings in relation to the impugned FIR against the applicant would be unnecessary harassment to the applicant. I have also considered the latest decision of the Apex Court in the case of ‘ Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others v. State of Gujarat ’, Criminal Appeal No.1723 of 2017, dated 4.10.2017 and the guidelines issued by the Apex Court in the said decision, particularly Paragraph-15, thereof. Considering the nature of disputes between the parties which are all private in nature, I am of the opinion that the matter requires consideration. It appears that the trial would be futile and further continuance of the proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIR would amount to abuse of process of law and hence, to secure the ends of justice, the impugned FIR is required to be quashed and set aside in exercise of powers conferred under Section 482 of the Code.

7. In view of the above, the impugned FIR being CR No.11198047210090/2021 and 11198047210091/2021 both registered at Shihor Police Station, Bhavnagar are quashed. Accordingly, all the consequential proceedings are hereby quashed and set aside.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top