Passport authorities must renew passports for 10 years for qualifying applicants when the Trial Court directs renewal "as per rules" without specifying a period, as the authority to restrict travel rests solely with the Trial Court.

JUDGMENT

1. RULE returnable forthwith. Ms. Dixa Pandya, learned AGP waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.1 and Mr. Bhate, learned Standing Counsel waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent Nos 2 and 3.

2. With the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties, the present petition is taken up for hearing.

3. Present petition is filed by the petitioner under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and under the provisions of the Passport Act, 1967 seeking direction to respondent passport authority to renew the passport of the petitioner for the period of 10 years.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGP for respondent No.1 and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

5. Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that under the prevalent rules of the GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993, the respondent authority has to renew the passport of the petitioner for a period of 10 years. He has submitted that as the validity of the petitioner’s passport was expired, the petitioner had applied for renewal of the passport for the period of 10 years. He has submitted that the petitioner has to travel to abroad but due to non-renewal of the passport, he is not able to visit. He has, therefore, submitted that appropriate direction be passed since the petitioner is well settled and has no intention of absconding.

5.1 Learned advocate for the petitioner in support of his submissions has relied upon the judgment of the Division Bench of Bombay High Court reported in 2014 SCC Online Bom 356 Narendra K. Ambwani Vs. Union of India & Ors. wherein the Bombay High Court has issued guidelines to be followed by the passport authorities where the Trial Court has directed that the passport may be renewed as per the rules.

6. Per contra, Mr. Pradip D. Bhate, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents has submitted that the passport of the petitioner has been renewed from time to time in terms of the GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993. He submits that in view of said Notification, the passport authorities have issued the passport as per the rules and the prevalent notifications. He submits that, however, there is no restriction on this Court to issue a direction for issuance of the passport for a certain period of validity as per the rules. He, therefore, submits that appropriate directions be passed accordingly.

7. Considered the submissions and perused the documents on record.

8. The GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993 reads as under:-

“G.S.R 570 (E)-In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of the Section 22 of the Passports Act 1967 (15 of 1967) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of External Affairs No. G.S.R. 298(E), dated the 14th April, 1976, the Central Government, being of the opinion that it is necessary in public interest to do so, hereby exempts citizens of India against whom proceedings in respect of an offences alleged to have been committed by them are pending before a criminal court in India and who produce orders from the court concerned permitting them to depart from India, from the operation of the provisions of Clause (f) of sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the said Act, subject to the following conditions