SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 14113

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD


NEUTRAL CITATION

C/CIA/8/2023 ORDER DATED: 24/04/2026

0.7946928544473408


R/CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8 of 2023

With

CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 2 of 2023

In R/CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8 of 2023


BHAGYALAXMI SUSHIL TEWARY

Versus

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS, AHMEDABAD


Appearance:

MR HARSHIT TOLIA, SENIOR ADVOCATE with MR LUV S SHAH(9365) for the Petitioner

MS VYOMA K JHAVERI(6386) for the Respondent(s) No. 1


CORAM:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRAL R. MEHTA


Date : 24/04/2026

ORAL ORDER

1. By way of this Civil Appeal under Section 91 of the Trademark Act, 2019, the appellant has called in question the legality and validity of the order dated 8.12.2022 passed by the learned Assistant Registrar of Trademarks in Trademark Application No.5286906. By the said order, the learned Assistant Registrar of Trademarks has rejected the application under Section 18 of the Trademark Act, 2019 preferred by the appellant for registration of device mark.

2. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. Harshit Tolia with learned advocate Mr.Luv Shah for the appellant and learned advocate Ms. Vyoma Jhaveri for the respondent.

3. Considering the impugned order, the said order, as it appears, is a cryptic order. The learned Assistant Registrar of Trademarks, while dealing with the application under Section 18 of the Trademark Act, 2019, has not passed a reasoned order. It is a settled proposition of law that the reasons are most relevant portion of any order. It appears that the learned Assistant Registrar of Trademarks has also not referred the submissions those were made and also not dealt with the same.

4. In my considered opinion, the impugned order is viced being non-speaking order. Thus, this Court, instead of going further on merits, only on the ground of non-speaking order, is inclined to accept the Appeal by quashing and setting aside the impugned order.

5. Resultantly, the Appeal is allowed. The order impugned is hereby quashed and set aside. The proceedings arising from Trademark Application No.5286906 is hereby ordered to be restored to its original file.

6. Needless to clarify that the learned Assistant Registrar of Trademarks shall decide the proceedings afresh in accordance with law and in conformity with the principles of natural justice.

7. Needless to further clarify that while deciding the proceedings afresh, the appellant is at liberty to file additional documents for consideration, showing the subsequent developments. The same also to be taken into consideration by the learned Assistant Registrar of Trademarks. Consequently, the Civil Application No.2 of 2023 also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top