SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 14908

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
MUKESHBHAI GORCHANDBHAI CHAMKAV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
R/CR.A/1157/2014



IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (AGAINST CONVICTION) NO. 1157 of 2014 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI ==========================================================

Approved for Reporting Yes No ==========================================================

MUKESHBHAI GORCHANDBHAI CHAMKA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================

Appearance:

MR GAJENDRA P BAGHEL(2968) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR SHAMBHUKUMAR(13426) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR RONAK RAVAL, APP for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI Date : 03/03/2026

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI)

1. The present criminal appeal has been preferred under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the appellant - Mukeshbhai Gorchandbhai Chamka, challenging the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 14.03.2014 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dahod, in Sessions Case No.108 of 2013.

2. By the impugned judgment, the appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, "IPC"). He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only), in default, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence under Section 376 IPC, and rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only), in default, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence under Section 302 IPC. Both sentences were directed to run concurrently.

3. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present appeals are as under:

3.1. On 08.04.2013, a marriage ceremony took place at the house of Samsubhai Bhuria in village Uchvania, District Dahod. The victim, a minor girl aged about 13 years, had gone to attend the "Vana Ceremony" - a traditional short marriage procession in the Dahod region that follows the "Ganpati Sthapan" ritual. After the ceremony ended, around 12:30 a.m., the appellant - Mukeshbhai Gorchandbhai Chamka - took the victim with him to a lonely field. There, against her will and without her consent, he committed sexual intercourse with her, thereby committed rape. When she shouted for help, the appellant smothered her, and thereby caused her death. He also caused injuries to her private parts.

3.2. The father of the victim, Badiyabhai Nanjibhai Chamka, lodged the First Information Report (FIR) on the same day, i.e., 08.04.2013, at Dahod Rural Police Station, which was registered as I-C.R.

No.79/2013 under Sections 376 and 302 IPC.

3.3. The Investigating Officer conducted the necessary investigation, prepared the inquest panchnama on the dead body in the presence of panch witnesses, drew the panchnama of the scene of offence, sent the body for postmortem examination and collected the postmortem report, seized the clothes from the dead body, obtained the FSL primary report, recorded statements of witnesses, arrested the appellant, conducted discovery panchnama under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, at the place shown by the appellant, collected blood-stained soil from the scene, obtained samples including semen, blood, vaginal swab, and cervical swab from the doctor, sent the muddamal articles to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL), and collected the FSL report.

3.4. Upon completion of the investigation, a charge-sheet was filed against the appellant before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dahod. Since the offences were exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, the case was committed to the Sessions Court, Dahod, under Section 209 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, vide order dated 18.08.2013, and registered as Sessions Case No.108/2013.

3.5. The appella

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top