SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 15635

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Hemant M. Prachchhak, J
HANSABEN DAHYABHAI PATHAKV/sUNION OF INDIA
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7073 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Hiren R Pandya
For the Respondents: Pradip D Bhate

Passport authorities lack the jurisdiction to determine the right of an accused to travel abroad; if the Trial Court permits renewal under the rules, the passport should be issued for the standard 10-year period, while travel permissions remain subject to Trial Court conditions.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 14, 19, and 226 of the Constitution of India and the Passport Act, 1967, seeking a direction for the issuance of a fresh passport for a period of 10 years. The respondent authority had declined to issue the passport for the requested duration due to the pendency of a criminal complaint against the petitioner, citing GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993. The court found that the passport authority's refusal to grant the standard validity period was inconsistent with the intended application of the rules when court permission is obtained. The primary issue was whether the passport authority has the jurisdiction to limit the validity of a passport for an individual facing criminal proceedings when the Trial Court permits renewal. The court reasoned that the authority to decide whether an accused has a right to travel abroad is vested solely in the Trial Court, not the passport authorities. Relying on persuasive precedent, the court held that if the Magistrate directs renewal under the rules, the passport should be issued for the standard period of 10 years. The respondent authority is hereby directed to decide the application of the petitioner for fresh passport within period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of present order and issue fresh passport to the petitioner for a period of 10 years.

Table of Content
1. dispute regarding the validity period of a passport for a person facing criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. interpretation of gsr notification 570(e) regarding passport issuance for citizens with pending criminal cases. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. passport authorities cannot decide travel rights; trial court jurisdiction prevails for determining travel conditions. (Para 10 , 11)
4. direction to issue a 10-year passport subject to trial court permission for actual travel. (Para 12 , 13)

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Draft amendment is allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Standing Counsel waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents.

3. By way of the present writ petition, filed under Articles 14, 19 and 226 of the Constitution of India r/w the provision of Passport Act, 1967 the petitioner has prayed for direction to issue fresh passport to the petitioner for period of 10 years.

4. Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that under the prevalent rules of the GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993, the respondent authority has to renew the passport of the petitioner for a period of 10 years. He has submitted that the petitioner had applied for fresh passport, however, the respondent authority has not issued the passport for 10 years on the ground of pendency of the criminal complaint against the petitioner.

5. Mr. Pradip D. Bhate, learned advocate for the respondent submits that the passport application of the petitioner is to be processed in accordance with the GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993. He submits that the citizens who are facing criminal proceedings have to produce orders from the Court concerned permitting them to depart from India.

6. Heard learned advocates for the parties, perused the documents on record and considered the submissions.

7. At the outset, it is not in dispute that the application of the petitioner for fresh passport is still pending before the concerned respondent authority. The said application is to be processed in accordance with the GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993.

8. At this stage, it is appropriate to refer the GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993 reads as under:-

“G.S.R 570 (E)-In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of the Section 22 of the Passports Act 1967 (15 of 1967) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of External Affairs No. G.S.R. 298(E), dated the 14th April, 1976, the Central Government, being of the opinion that it is necessary in public interest to do so, hereby exempts citizens of India against whom proceedings in respect of an offences alleged to have been committed by them are pending before a criminal court in India and who produce orders from the court concerned permitting them to depart from India, from the operation of the provisions of Clause (f) of sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the said Act, subject to the following conditions, namely :-

(a) the passport to be issued to every such citizen shall be issued-

(i) for the period specified in order of the court referred to above, if the court specifies a period for which the passport has to be issued; or

(ii) if no period either for the issue of the passport or for the travel abroad is specified in such order, the passport shall be issued or a period one year.

(iii) if such order gives permission to travel abroad for a period less than one year, but does not specify the periodvalidity of the passport, the passport shall be issued for one year; or

(iv) if such order gives permission to travel abroad for a period exceeding one year, and does not specify the validity of the passport, then the passport shall be issued for period of travel abroad specified in the order.

(b) any passport issued in terms of (a) (ii) and (a) (iii) above can be further renewed for one year at a time, provided the applicant has not travelled abr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top