SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 15646

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Ilesh J. Vora, R. T. Vachhani, JJ
THAKOR LALAJI NARSANGJI FATAJIV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE) NO. 1 of 2026 | R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 907 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Yogendra Thakore
For the Respondents: Tirthraj Pandya

A court may exercise discretion to suspend a sentence and grant bail pending appeal if the convict was on bail during the trial and the appeal is unlikely to be heard in the near future, even in cases involving the POCSO Act.

Headnote:The applicant sought suspension of sentence under Section 430 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, following a conviction under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS and Sections 4(2) and 6 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act. The case involved a victim aged approximately 17 years who had stayed with the applicant for two days due to a personal relationship. The trial court had sentenced the applicant to terms ranging from 7 to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment. The primary issue was whether the applicant had made out a sufficient case for the suspension of the sentence pending appeal. The court observed that the parties maintained an intimate relationship and noted that the applicant had been on bail throughout the trial process. Furthermore, the court considered that the appeal was unlikely to be heard in the near future, justifying the exercise of discretion in favor of the convict. Accordingly, present application is allowed.

Table of Content
1. background of conviction under bns and pocso act and the subsequent application for suspension of sentence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding the victim's age, consent, and the applicant's prior bail status. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court's reasoning for granting bail based on the nature of the relationship and the timeline of the appeal. (Para 7 , 8)
4. granting of suspension of sentence and setting conditions for bail. (Para 9)

IA ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA)

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent State. By consent, Rule is fixed forthwith.

2. By way of this application under Section 430 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, applicant, seeks suspension of sentence awarded to him by the Sessions Court concerned for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2) 87 of the BNS and Sections 4(2) & 6 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act.

3. The present appeal and the application for suspension of sentence arise from the judgment dated 18.04.2026 and order of sentence passed in Special POCSO Case No. 56 of 2025, whereby, the applicant herein was convicted and sentenced as under:

Section Imprisonment Fine In default
137(2) & 87 of BNS RI for 7 yrs 5000 SI for 3 months
4(2) of POCSO Act RI for 20 yrs 5000 SI for 1 yr
6 of POCSO Act RI for 20 yrs 10000 SI for 1 yr

4. Facts and circumstances giving rise to file present application are that the victim aged about 17 years and more, due to relations with the applicant, stayed with him for about 2 days at the house of accused’s friend. In such circumstances, on the basis of FIR and upon filing the chargesheet, the trial was proceeded against him and at the end, he found guilty.

5. Learned advocate Mr. Yogendra Thakore, appearing on behalf of the applicant while praying for suspension of sentence contended that, the victim at the verge of completion of 18 years and due to her relations, she herself came at the spot and then both had proceeded at the house of co-accused. The accused was throughout on bail. The appeal may not likely to be heard in near future. In such circumstances, it is requested that prayer may be considered.

6. On the other hand, Mr. Tirthraj Pandya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has supported the impugned judgment and order of conviction as passed by the trial Court and contended that the victim was minor and theory of consent cannot be appreciated at this stage.

7. Issue arises as to whether the applicant has made out a case for suspension of sentence?

8. We have carefully examined the case records and considered the submissions made at the bar. In the facts of the present case, victim and accused due to their relations, maintained intimate relationship. The accused was throughout on bail. The appeal will not likely to be listed for final hearing in near future. In such circumstances, we are persuaded to exercise our discretion in favour of the applicant convict for the purpose of suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

9. Accordingly, present application is allowed. Rule is made absolute to aforesaid extent. The sentence of the applicant awarded vide judgment dated 18.04.2026 by the learned Special (POCSO) Judge in Special (POCSO) Case No. 56 of 2025 is suspended during the pendency of the Criminal Appeal and the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court subject to condition that he will not leave India without prior permission of this Court and shall appear before this court as and when appeal is taken for final hearing and shall not change his address and in case of change in address, shall inform to the concerned police station as well as to this Court. Direct service permitted.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top