IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
FARID BASIRBHAI KHOD VAGHER THRO AMINABEN BASIRBHAI KHODV/sDIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
R/SCR.A/6800/2026
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/SCR.A/6800/2026 ORDER DATED: 08/05/2026
0.7209353000314288
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6800 of 2026
==========================================================
FARID BASIRBHAI KHOD VAGHER THRO AMINABEN BASIRBHAI KHOD
Versus
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR HEMANT B RAVAL(3491) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Date : 08/05/2026
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI)
Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of
the respondents. By consent, Rule is fixed forthwith.
1. The present petition is directed against the order of detention dated
21.04.2026 (actual date of detention is 22.04.2026) passed by the
respondent – detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under
Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985
(for short ‘the Act’), whereby the respondent - detaining authority has
detained the petitioner - detenue as defined under Section 2(g) of the Act.
2. Heard the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner – detenue
and learned APP appearing for the respondent – State.
3. Learned advocate for the petitioner - detenue submits that the
Page 1 of 5
Uploaded by MR.MITESH VIJAYBHAI PANCHAL(HCD0065) on Fri May 08 2026 Downloaded on : Fri May 15 04:50:00 IST 2026
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION
R/SCR.A/6800/2026 ORDER DATED: 08/05/2026
0.7209353000314288
impugned order of detention is required to be quashed and set-aside since
the detaining authority has passed the order of detention solely on the
ground of registration of 1 criminal case, as mentioned in the impugned
detention order, and that by itself cannot bring the case of the petitioner -
detenue within the purview of definition under Section 2(g) of the Act.
Learned advocate for the petitioner – detenue further submitted that the
illegal activities alleged to have been carried out or likely to be carried
out, as alleged, cannot have any nexus or bearing with the maintenance of
public order and at the most it can be said to be a breach of law and order.
Further, except the statements of the witnesses and the registration of the
above FIRs, no other relevant and cogent material is on record which
would show that the alleged anti-social activities of the petitioner -
detenue fall under the category of breach of public order. Learned
advocate further submitted that it is not possible to hold, on the basis of
the facts of the present case, that the activities of the petitioner - detenue
with respect to the criminal cases had affected and disturbed the social
fabric of the society, eventually which would become threat to the very
existence of the normal and routine life of the people at large or that on
the basis of the registration of criminal cases, the petitioner - detenue had
put the entire social apparatus in disorder, making it difficult for the
whole system to exist, as a system governed by rule of law, by disturbing
the public order. It is also submitted that the detaining authority has also
not applied its mind to the fact that the petitioner – detenue is released on
bail in all the offences.
4. Learned APP for the respondent-State has supported the detention
order passed by the detaining authority and has submitted that sufficient
materials and evidences were found during the course of investigation
and the same were even supplied to the petitioner – detenue, which
indicate that the detenue is in the habit of indulging into activities as
Page 2 of 5
Uploaded by MR.MITESH VIJAYBHAI PANCHAL(HCD0065) on Fri May 08 2026 Downloaded on : Fri May 15 04:50:00 IST 2026
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION
R/SCR.A/6800/2026 ORDER DATED: 08/05/2026
0.7209353000314288
defined under Section 2(g) of the Act and considering the facts of the
case, the detainin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.