##PAGE1##

NEUTRAL CITATION

Modification of Order dtd.

C/SA/563/2025 2 9 / 0 4 / 2 0 2 6 i n R / S A / 5 6 3 / 2 0 2 5 ORDER DATED: 07/05/2026

0.4037982013315936

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 563 of 2025

[On note for speaking to minutes of order dated 29/04/2026 in

R/SA/563/2025 ]

With

R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 566 of 2025

================================================================

DIPAKBHAI GHANSHYAMBHAI MAJETHIYA

Versus

MANJULABEN D/O CHIMANLAL BABURAM MEHTA AND W/O

PRAVINCHANDRA REVASHANKAR RAVAL & ORS.

================================================================

Appearance:

MR JAIMIN A MEHTA(10552) for the Appellant(s) No. 1

MR NARENDRA RANAMALJI MADHU(13497) for the Appellant(s) No. 1

MS KINJAL P SHUKLA(10226) for the Appellant(s) No. 1

DHRUV R YAGNIK(7876) for the Respondent(s) No. 6

MR JINESH H KAPADIA(5601) for the Respondent(s) No. 6

NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1,3

NOTICE UNSERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 4,5

UNSERVED EXPIRED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 2

================================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI

Date : 07/05/2026

COMMON ORAL ORDER

1. Perused the note for speaking to minutes.

2. In the fourth and fifth line of the paragraph No.2 of the order

dated 29.04.2026 passed in the captioned Second Appeals, the words

from “permission may be granted to withdraw the present appeal.”

shall be rectified and read as under:-

“The parties to abide by the settlement arrived between them during

mediation proceedings. Appeal stands disposed of in view of aforesaid

settlement.”

Page 1 of 2

Uploaded by RINKU MALI(HC01574) on Thu May 07 2026 Downloaded on : Fri May 15 09:33:55 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION

Modification of Order dtd.

C/SA/563/2025 2 9 / 0 4 / 2 0 2 6 i n R / S A / 5 6 3 / 2 0 2 5 ORDER DATED: 07/05/2026

0.4037982013315936

3. Rest of the order shall remain as it is.

4. Note for speaking to minutes stands disposed of. Registry to

issue fresh writ / order accordingly.

(D. M. DESAI,J)

RINKU MALI

Page 2 of 2

Uploaded by RINKU MALI(HC01574) on Thu May 07 2026 Downloaded on : Fri May 15 09:33:55 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION

Present Order is modified vide

C/SA/563/2025 O r d e r d t d . 0 7 / 0 5 / 2 0 2 6 i n ORDER DATED: 29/04/2026

R/SA/563/2025

0.4037982013315936

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 563 of 2025

With

CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2025

In R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 563 of 2025

With

R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 566 of 2025

With

CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2025

In R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 566 of 2025

==========================================================

DIPAKBHAI GHANSHYAMBHAI MAJETHIYA

Versus

MANJULABEN D/O CHIMANLAL BABURAM MEHTA AND W/O

PRAVINCHANDRA REVASHANKAR RAVAL & ORS.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR JAIMIN A MEHTA(10552) for the Appellant(s) No. 1

MR NARENDRA RANAMALJI MADHU(13497) for the Appellant(s) No. 1

MS KINJAL P SHUKLA(10226) for the Appellant(s) No. 1

DHRUV R YAGNIK(7876) for the Respondent(s) No. 6

MR JINESH H KAPADIA(5601) for the Respondent(s) No. 6

NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1,3

NOTICE UNSERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 4,5

UNSERVED EXPIRED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 2

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI

Date : 29/04/2026

COMMON ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.

2. Learned advocate for the appellants submitted that the

dispute between the parties is settled in the Mediation Centre

and now appellants do not want to proceed with the matter

and therefore, permission may be granted to withdraw the

present appeal.

Page 1 of 2

Uploaded by SHIVANI SHUKLA(HC02350) on Thu Apr 30 2026 Downloaded on : Fri May 15 09:33:55 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION

Present Order is modified vide

C/SA/563/2025 O r d e r d t d . 0 7 / 0 5 / 2 0 2 6 i n ORDER DATED: 29/04/2026

R/SA/563/2025

0.4037982013315936

3. In view of the submissions canvassed by learned advocate

for the appellants, and in view of