SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 17512

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Hemant M. Prachchhak, J
MINOR AYESHA MOHAMED JAVED SHAIKHV/sSURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
C/SCA/5865/2026 | R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5865 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ezzazuddin B Huseni
For the Respondents: Kaushal D Pandya

The Registrar is authorized and directed to correct erroneous entries in the birth register and issue a fresh certificate upon verification of satisfactory documentary evidence provided by the applicant under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969.

Headnote:The petitioner sought relief under Articles 14, 19, 21, and 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, for the correction of her name in the Birth Register and Birth Certificate. The petitioner's name was inadvertently recorded as “Hibah Mohamed Javed Shaikh” instead of “Ayesha Mohamed Javed Shaikh,” although school records and Aadhaar card correctly reflected the latter. The respondent authority had refused to consider the application for correction, claiming a lack of authority. The central issue was whether the respondent authority is required to correct an erroneous entry in the birth register upon the production of satisfactory evidence. The court observed that the petitioner had already submitted an application dated 03/02/2026 along with supporting documents and that the discrepancy was evident when compared to educational records. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Table of Content
1. the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the municipal authority to correct a clerical error in the birth register based on supporting identity documents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. the court recognizes the validity of the petitioner's claim by noting the consistency of the correct name across school records and aadhaar cards. (Para 6)
3. the court directs the administrative authority to verify evidence and issue a corrected certificate within a specified timeframe. (Para 7 , 8)

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. RULE returnable forthwith. Mr.Kaushal Pandya, learned counsel waives services of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent.

2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.

3. Present petition is filed by the petitioner under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226 of the Constitution of India and under the provisions of the Births and Deaths Registrations Act, 1969 with the following reliefs:-

“13(A) THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO hold the impugned actions of the Respondent - Birth-Death-Marriage Department, Surat Municipal Corporation, of not considering the Application dated 03/02/2026 for correction of the name of the Petitioner in the Register of Births and Birth Certificate as illegal, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969.

(B) THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO direct the Respondent Birth-Death-Marriage Department, Surat Municipal Corporation to immediately and forthwith correct the name of the petitioner to "Ayesha Mohamed Javed Shaikh" in the Register of Births and Birth Certificate.

(C) In the alternative. THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO direct the Respondent-Birth-Death- Marriage Department. Surat Municipal Corporation to immediately and forthwith consider and allow the application dated 03/02/2026 preferred by the Petitioner for correction of the name of the Petitioner in the Register of Births and Birth Certificate.

(D) THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO grant such other and further relief to the petitioner as me deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

4. Short facts of the present petition are that the Petitioner was born on 23/04/2012 at Golden Gift Hospital, Surat, to Hafsah and Mohamed Javed Sheikh. Though the Petitioner's correct name is “Ayesha Mohamed Javed Shaikh,” due to an inadvertent error, her name was wrongly recorded as “Hibah Mohamed Javed Shaikh” in the Birth Register and Birth Certificate. The said error remained unnoticed for several years.

4.1 After the death of the Petitioner's mother in 2015 and the incarceration of her father, the Petitioner has been under the care and custody of her guardian, Mr. Abdul Vadood Ahmedmia Jarullah. The Petitioner is presently studying in Standard 8, and her name is correctly recorded as “Ayesha Mohamed Javed Shaikh” in all school records and Aadhaar Card.

4.2 The discrepancy came to light only when the Petitioner applied for APAAR ID and was required to produce the Birth Certificate. Thereafter, on 03/02/2026, the Petitioner applied before the Respondent Registrar for correction of her name in the Birth Register and Birth Certificate along with supporting documents. However, the Respondent refused to consider the application stating that he had no authority to make such correction.

4.3 The Petitioner submits that under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, the Registrar has the authority to correct erroneous entries upon production of satisfactory evidence. Since the Petitioner is changing school for Standard 9 and will require correct records for future educational purposes, urgent directions are necessary for correction of the Petitioner's name in the Birth Register and Birth Certificate.

5. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the in action on the part of the respondent – authority, the present petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top