SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 15888

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Ilesh J. Vora, R. T. Vachhani, JJ
KHIMAJI BHUMAJI GAMARV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (REGULAR BAIL) NO. 1 of 2026 | R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 393 of 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: THROUGH JAIL
For the Respondents: Krina Calla

Suspension of sentence and grant of bail may be granted to a convict when there is a significant period of incarceration and the appeal is delayed due to judicial backlog.

Headnote:The applicant was convicted under Sections 302, 323, 324, 504, 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the GP Act for the murder of an individual on 15.04.2014, motivated by a relationship with the deceased's niece. The trial court, after appreciating the evidence, sentenced the applicant to life imprisonment and other terms. The applicant sought suspension of sentence on the grounds of having completed over 11 years of incarceration while the appeal remained pending. The court framed the issue as to whether the applicant had made out a case for suspension of sentence. The court reasoned that the applicant had been incarcerated for 12 years and, given the backlog of old appeals, the appeal filed in 2020 was unlikely to be heard in the near future, thus justifying the exercise of discretion in favor of the convict. Accordingly, present application is allowed.

Table of Content
1. background of conviction and sentencing for murder and related offenses. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding the eligibility for suspension of sentence based on time served. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. grant of bail due to prolonged incarceration and judicial backlog. (Para 8 , 9)

IA ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA)

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent State. By consent, Rule is fixed forthwith.

2. By way of this application, through jail, applicant seeks suspension of sentence awarded to him by the Sessions Court concerned for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 323, 324, 504, 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of GP Act .

3. The present appeal and the application for suspension of sentence arise from the judgment dated 26.12.2019 and order of sentence passed in Sessions Case No. 71 of 2014, whereby, the applicant herein was convicted and sentenced as under:

Section of IPC Imprisonment Fine In default Imprisonment
302 of IPC RI for Life 3000 1 yr
323 RI for 6 months 200 SI for 1 month
324 RI for 1 yr 500 SI for 2 months
504 RI for 6 months 200 SI for 1 month
506(2) RI for 2 yrs 500 SI for 2 months
135 of GP Act RI for 1 month

4. Facts and circumstances giving rise to file present application are that the accused applicant herein, killed deceased Sanjabhai on 15.04.2014 at village: Bhambhudi by stabbing him multiple times with the knife. The motive behind the murder was relation of the applicant with the niece of the deceased. In such circumstances, on the basis of FIR and chargesheet, the trail Court after appreciation of the evidence, held guilty the accused for the offences referred above.

5. The applicant herein requested this Court to consider his prayer for suspension of sentence and grant of bail, as he has completed more than 11 years of his jail term and till date, his appeal has not listed on board.

6. Ms. Krina Calla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has supported the impugned judgment and order of conviction as passed by the trial Court and contended that the offence proved is serious one and in absence of any exceptional circumstances, the applicant may not be entertained.

7. Issue arises as to whether the applicant has made out a case for suspension of sentence?

8. We have carefully examined the case records and considered the submissions, admittedly, the incarceration period is 12 years. The appeal is filed in the year 2020. In view of the backlog of old appeals, the appeal filed by the convict may not likely to be heard in near future. In such circumstances, having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, we are persuaded to exercise our discretion in favour of the applicant convict for the purpose of suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

9. Accordingly, present application is allowed. Rule is made absolute to aforesaid extent. The sentence of the applicant awarded vide judgment dated 26.12.2019 by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Sabarkantha at Idar in Sessions Case No. 71 of 2014 is suspended during the pendency of the Criminal Appeal and the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- subject to condition that he will not leave India without prior permission of this Court and shall appear before this court as and when appeal is taken for final hearing and shall not change his address and in case of change in address, shall inform to the concerned police station as well as to this Court. Registry is directed to inform the jail authority accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top