SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 16143

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Bhargav D. Karia, L. S. Pirzada, JJ
HEMANTKUMAR BALWANTRAI KHANVANSHIV/sMAVJIBHAI GOVINDBHAI (DELETED)
C/FA/3299/2017 | R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 3299 of 2017 | CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shaivang D Mehta
For the Respondents: Jayraj Chauhan, NV Gandhi, Varsha Brahmbhatt

A court may quash a previous judgment and refer the matter back to the trial court to pass a consent decree when parties successfully resolve their dispute through mediation.

Headnote:The matter pertains to a first appeal challenging a judgment and decree passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and ACJM, Bardoli in a special civil suit. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties underwent mediation, which resulted in a successful settlement reduced to writing as per the report dated 24.04.2026. The court addressed whether the appeal could be disposed of in light of the mediation settlement. The court reasoned that since the parties had reached a written agreement and the Mediation Center confirmed the success of the process, the previous impugned judgment should be set aside to facilitate the recording of a consent decree. Impugned Judgement and Order dated 12.05.2017 passed below Exhibit 14 by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge and ACJM, Bardoli in Special Civil Suit No. 53/2016 along with the Judgement and Decree dated 12.07.2017 are hereby quashed and set aside and the matter is referred back to the Trial Court to pass a consent decree in terms of settlement.

Table of Content
1. parties reaching a successful settlement through the mediation process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court's authority to set aside a judgment to allow for a consent decree based on mediation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Shaivang Mehta for the appellant and learned advocate Mr. Jayraj Chauhan for respondent Nos. 4.1 to 4.3.

2. It is stated at bar by learned advocate Mr. Jayraj Chauhan that the learned advocates for the respondents are aggreable for the settlement arrived at during the course of mediation.

3. The Mediation Center has submitted a report dated 24.04.2026 stating that the mediation was successful and the settlement has been reduced in writing.

4. Learned advocate Mr. Jayraj Chauhan submitted that the appeal may be disposed of in terms of Paragraph Nos. 9, 10 and 11 of the Terms of Settlement between the parties.

5. The Mediation report along with Terms of Settlement signed by both sides is ordered to be taken on record. Learned advocate for both sides are entitled to get the certified copy of the Terms of Settlement. The Registry is directed to do the needful.

6. Impugned Judgement and Order dated 12.05.2017 passed below Exhibit 14 by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge and ACJM, Bardoli in Special Civil Suit No. 53/2016 along with the Judgement and Decree dated 12.07.2017 are hereby quashed and set aside and the matter is referred back to the Trial Court to pass a consent decree in terms of settlement. The First Appeal is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs.

7. In view of disposal of appeal, civil application would not survive. The same is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top