ORDER :

S.V. PINTO, J.

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP Mr.Aditya Jadeja and learned advocate Mr.Ankit Dixit waive service of notice of rule for the respective respondents.

2. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to quash and set aside the FIR No.11191015211324 registered with Nikol Police Station, Ahmedabad City for the offences under Sections 306, 384, 387 and 114 etc. of Indian Penal Code, u/s. 5, 33(3) and 42 etc. of the Money Lenders Act and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Heard learned advocate Mr.Dinesh M. Desai for the applicant, learned APP Mr. Aditya Jadeja for the respondent no.1 – State and learned advocate Mr. Ankit Dixit for the respondent no.2 – original complainant.

5. Learned advocate Mr.Dinesh M. Desai for the applicant and learned advocate Mr. Ankit Dixit for the respondent no.2 – original complainant jointly submit that the impugned FIR qua the co-accused have been quashed and set aside by this Court vide order dated 01.04.2026 passed in Special Criminal Application (Quashing) No. 13880 of 2023, order dated 27.04.2026 passed in Special Criminal Application (Quashing) Nos. 12896 of 2023 and 9652 of 2023. Learned advocates further submit that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled between the parties and the respondent no.2 – original complainant does not wish to prosecute the matter further. The compromise has been arrived due to intervention of trusted pending people of the society and well-wishers of the both the sides and, therefore, the respondent no.2 has no objection if the impugned FIR as well as all the other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto are quashed against the applicant – accused.

6. Learned advocate Mr. Ankit Dixit for the respondent no.2 – original complainant submits that the respondent no.2 – original complainant is present before this Court and produced her affidavit stating that the dispute between the parties is amicably settled and she has no objection if the impugned FIR and consequential proceedings are quashed The affidavit filed by the respondent no.2 – original complainant is taken on record.

7. Learned APP Mr. Aditya Jadeja for the respondent no.1 – State submits that the contents of the FIR are just and proper; however, considering the fact that the dispute between the parties is amicably settled, necessary order may be passed.

8. The affidavit filed by the respondent no. 2 – original complainant reads as under:

I, SAROJBEN BHUPENDRABHALKAMALIYA, age 42 years, Gender Female, Occupation Housewife, residing at: B/45, Geetapark, Narayannagar, Vibhag 1, Khodiyarnagar, Ahmedabad 382350. The respondent no.2 (org complainant) in the main application herein state and declare on oath and solemnly affirm as under :-

1. I respectfully submit that I the original complainant in FIR registered being CR No.11191015211324/2021 with Nikol Police station. Dist Ahmedabad For the offence punishable under sections IPC 306, 384, 387, 114 and the Money Laundry Act 5, 33(3), 42 wherein of on conclusion of the investigation the investigating officer has filed charge sheet which is culminated into sessions case no.787-2023 and the same is pending. I say and submit upon intervention of trusted pending people of the society and well-wishers of the both sides settlement has been arrived between the complainant (res. no ) and applicant. I further submit that the dispute between the parties has been resolved.

2. I have amicably settled the matter by way of compromise with the applicants, I have no dispute with the applicants and I hereby undertake to withdraw all the allegations / litigations against the applicant.

3. I respectfully say and submit that the settlement arrived between us would be binding to me / my legal representative with respect to this offences I have settled this matter without any coercion or force from the applicants.

4. I respectfully say and submit that I am