Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 17136
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V. Pinto, J
PARTNER AND ADMINITRATOR OF RAJ CORPORATION RAMESHBHAI JIVRAMBHAI DESAIV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR DIRECTION) NO. 1 of 2026 | R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 922 of 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Jeet B Karia
For the Respondents: Public Prosecutor, Jigar G Gadhavi
The court exercised its power to correct a clerical or factual error in a previous order through a 'Speaking to Minutes' application to accurately reflect the direction given regarding the furnishing of surety under Section 437-A of the CrPC.
Headnote:The matter pertains to an application for 'Speaking to Minutes' to modify a previous order dated 23.04.2026. The court examined the requirement for the applicant to furnish surety under Section 437-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure in compliance with the Trial Court's order. The primary issue was the correction of a factual statement in Para 3 of the earlier order. The court reasoned that the wording stating the applicant 'has furnished surety' was inaccurate and should be replaced with 'was directed to furnish surety' to correctly reflect the judicial direction. Speaking to Minutes stands disposed of.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. correction of clerical errors in judicial orders via speaking to minutes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
IA ORDER
1. Speaking to Minutes is allowed.
2. In Para – 3 of the order dated 23.04.2026, the words mentioned as “It is further noted that the applicant has furnished surety under Section 437-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure in compliance with the order passed by the learned Trial Court.” are replaced with the words “The applicant was directed to furnish surety under Section 437-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure in compliance with the order passed by the learned Trial Court.”.
3. Rest of the order shall remain as it is.
4. Registry to issue fresh writ accordingly.
5. Speaking to Minutes stands disposed of.
