Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 1 of 2026
In
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 932 of 2025
HITENDRAKUMAR UGALCHAND GADHECHA (OWNER OF H. KUMAR GEMS INCORPORATION)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
MR JEET B KARIA(11991) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
MR JIGAR G GADHAVI(5613) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO
04/05/2026
[On note for speaking to minutes of order dated 23/04/2026 in R/CR.A/932/2025 ]
IA ORDER
1. Speaking to Minutes is allowed.
2. In Para – 3 of the order dated 23.04.2026, the words mentioned as “It is further noted that the applicant has furnished surety under Section 437-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure in compliance with the order passed by the learned Trial Court.” are replaced with the words “The applicant was directed to furnish surety under Section 437-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure in compliance with the order passed by the learned Trial Court.”.
3. Rest of the order shall remain as it is.
4. Registry to issue fresh writ accordingly.
5. Speaking to Minutes stands disposed of.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
