2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 17171
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
GAJANAN MANAJI MISTRYV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
R/CR.RA/999/2017
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.RA/999/2017 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/05/2026
0.37072303848324695
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST ORDER
PASSED BY SUBORDINATE COURT) NO. 999 of 2017
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
============================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No
============================================
GAJANAN MANAJI MISTRY & ANR.
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
============================================
Appearance:
MR RAMNANDAN SINGH(1126) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2
MR MB RANA(2760) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN H. RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
============================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Date : 01/05/2026
JUDGMENT
1) By way of present revision application under Sections 397 and
401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicants have
sought following relief:-
“(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to call for records and
proceedings Atrocity (Special) Case No.70 of 2016 and be
pleased to quash and set aside impugned order dated
21.8.2017 passed by learned Special Judge, City Sessions
Court No.18 (Atrocity) Ahmedabad in Atrocity (Special)
Case No.70 of 2016 below Exh.6, by holding the same to
be illegal and unlawful.
(C) YOUR LORDSHIPS MAY BE PLEASED TO allow the
application below Ex 6 filed in Atrocity (Special) Case
Page 1 of 9
Uploaded by ANKIT YOGESHBHAI JANSARI(HCW0109) on Mon May 04 2026 Downloaded on : Sat May 16 21:59:00 IST 2026
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.RA/999/2017 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/05/2026
0.37072303848324695
No.70 of 2016 pending before Learned Special Judge, City
Sessions Court No.18 (Atrocity) Ahmedabad.;”
2) Brief facts of the present case are that one FIR being I-
C.R.No.132 of 2015, came to be registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 384, 323, 506(2), 294(a), 114, 415
and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1), (3), (5), (8),
(10) and (15) of The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, (which shall hereinafter be
referred to as “Atrocities Act” for short) with Gujarat University
Police Station, Ahmedabad. The applicants were arrested on
14.02.2016 and after completion of investigation, charge-sheet
came to be filed in which offences under Atrocities Act came to
be deleted as the investigating agency found that no case of
atrocity was made out. Thereafter, at the stage of framing of
charge before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate there was
objection raised by the complainant / prosecution that there are
elements of Sections 3(1), 3(5), 3(8), 3(10) and 3(15) of the
Atrocities Act and therefore, the matter was committed to the
special Atrocity Court as envisaged under Section 209 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure (which shall hereinafter be referred
to as “the Code” for short). The learned City Civil Court,
Ahmedabad, registered the case and numbered as Special
Atrocity Case No.70 of 2016. Thereafter, on 29.12.2016 the
applicants preferred the discharge application at Exhibit 6 under
Page 2 of 9
Uploaded by ANKIT YOGESHBHAI JANSARI(HCW0109) on Mon May 04 2026 Downloaded on : Sat May 16 21:59:00 IST 2026
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.RA/999/2017 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/05/2026
0.37072303848324695
Section 227 of the Code and prayed to be discharged as they
belongs to the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes
Community (which shall hereinafter be referred to as “SC/ST
Community” for short). Thereafter, the learned Special Judge,
City Sessions Court No.18, (Atrocity), Ahmedabad, has been
pleased to reject the discharge application at Exhibit 6, vide
order dated 21.08.2017. Being aggrieved with and dissatisfied
by the same the applicants have preferred the present revision
application.
3) Learned Advocate Mr. Ramnandan Singh for the applicants, has
submitted that the applicants are falsely enroped in the offence
by the complainant as the applicant no.1 – husband of the
applicant no.2 belongs to SC / ST community and evidence to
that effect has already been placed wi