SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 17259

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Hemant M. Prachchhak, J
BHAVESHKUMAR CHUNILAL RATHODV/sREGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3203 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vijay H Patel
For the Respondents: Pradip D Bhate

Passport authorities lack the jurisdiction to determine an accused person's right to travel abroad; such authority rests solely with the Trial Court. If the Trial Court permits travel, the passport should be renewed for 10 years in accordance with the applicable rules.

Headnote:(A) Passport Renewal - Pending Criminal Proceedings - Renewal of passport for a period of 10 years is permissible as per the Act and Rules, provided the Trial Court grants permission to travel, and passport authorities cannot independently decide the right to travel. (Para 10)

(B) GSR Notification 570(E) - Interpretation - Ambiguity regarding the period of passport issuance for persons facing criminal proceedings is resolved by ensuring renewal for 10 years if the Trial Court permits, rather than limiting it to one year. (Para 10)

Issues: Whether the passport of a person facing criminal proceedings can be renewed for 10 years despite the restrictions in GSR Notification 570(E).

Table of Content
1. dispute over passport renewal for a petitioner facing pending criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. analysis of gsr notification 570(e) regarding passport issuance for accused persons. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. trial court's exclusive authority to permit travel and the requirement for 10-year renewal. (Para 9 , 10)
4. direction to renew passport for 10 years subject to trial court travel permission. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Standing Counsel waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent.

2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for direction to renew the passport of the petitioner for period of 10 years.

3. Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that under the prevalent rules of the GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993, the respondent authority has to renew the passport of the petitioner for a period of 10 years. He has submitted that the petitioner had applied for re-issuance of the passport, however, the respondent has not reissued/renewed the passport on the ground of pending criminal case against the petitioner. He has submitted that the petitioner has to travel to abroad but due to non-renewal / non-issuance of the passport, he is not able to visit.

4. Mr. Pradip D. Bhate, learned advocate for the respondent submits that the passport application of the petitioner is to be processed in accordance with the GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993. He submits that the citizens who are facing criminal proceedings have to produce orders from the Court concerned permitting them to depart from India.

5. Heard learned advocates for the parties, perused the documents on record and considered the submissions.

6. At the outset, it is not in dispute that the application of the petitioner for re-issuance/renewal of the passport is still pending before the concerned respondent authority. Further, from the record it appears that investigation is over and chargesheet is filed by the investigation officer.

7. At this stage, it is appropriate to refer the GSR Notification 570(E) dated 25.08.1993 reads as under:-

“G.S.R 570 (E)-In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of the Section 22 of the Passports Act 1967 (15 of 1967) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of External Affairs No. G.S.R. 298(E), dated the 14th April, 1976, the Central Government, being of the opinion that it is necessary in public interest to do so, hereby exempts citizens of India against whom proceedings in respect of an offences alleged to have been committed by them are pending before a criminal court in India and who produce orders from the court concerned permitting them to depart from India, from the operation of the provisions of Clause (f) of sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the said Act, subject to the following conditions, namely :-

(a) the passport to be issued to every such citizen shall be issued-

(i) for the period specified in order of the court referred to above, if the court specifies a period for which the passport has to be issued; or

(ii) if no period either for the issue of the passport or for the travel abroad is specified in such order, the passport shall be issued or a period one year.

(iii) if such order gives permission to travel abroad for a period less than one year, but does not specify the periodvalidity of the passport, the passport shall be issued for one year; or

(iv) if such order gives permission to travel abroad for a period exceeding one year, and does not specify the validity of the passport, then the passport shall be issued for period of travel abroad specified in the order.

(b) any passport issued in terms of (a) (ii) and (a) (iii) above can be further renewed for one year at a time, provided the applicant has not travelled abroad for the period sanctioned by the court and provided further that, in the meantime, the order of the court is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top