IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI
GHANSHYAMSINH BAHRATSINHV/sEXECUTIVE ENGINEER
R/FA/153/2013
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/153/2013 ORDER DATED: 20/04/2026
0.24243809371278902
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 153 of 2013
With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 3 of 2025
In CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR BRINGING HEIRS) NO. 2 of 2025
In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 153 of 2013
With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR BRINGING HEIRS) NO. 2 of 2025
In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 153 of 2013
==========================================================
GHANSHYAMSINH BAHRATSINH & ORS.
Versus
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NISHANT LALAKIYA(5511) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
MR SATYAM Y CHHAYA(3242) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
MR BHARAT VYAS AGP for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI
Date : 20/04/2026
ORDER
ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF
DELAY ) NO.3 OF 2025 IN CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR
BRINGING HEIRS ) NO.2 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO . 153
OF 2013 .
1. The present application is filed by heirs and legal
representative of deceased appellant no.3 Jayvirsinh
Bharatsinh Jadeja to condone the delay of 5243 days caused in
filing the application for bringing themselves on record in
place of deceased appellant no.3 - Jayvirsinh Bharatsinh
Jadeja.
Page 1 of 4
Uploaded by MISHRA AMIT V.(HC00187) on Mon Apr 20 2026 Downloaded on : Mon May 18 18:30:47 IST 2026
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/153/2013 ORDER DATED: 20/04/2026
0.24243809371278902
2. Heard learned advocate Mr. Haribhai Patel for the
applicants and learned Assistant Government Pleader
Mr.Bharat Vyas for the respondent State.
3. Having referred to the contentions raised in the
application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963,
learned advocate Mr.Patel for the applicants would submit
that heirs and legal representative of original appellant no.3
were illiterate peasant and they were not knowing that they
were required to be brought on record in the main appeal and
thereby delay of 5243 days caused in filing the appeal.
Learned advocate Mr.Patel further submits that present
applicants are bona fide and once the file has been put to the
hands of learned advocate Mr.Patel, it comes to the
knowledge that they are required to be brought on record in
place of deceased appellant no.3. Therefore, learned advocate
Mr.Patel requests the Court to take the lenient view and allow
the present application to bring heirs of deceased appellant
no.3 on record.
4. The prayer of the learned advocate Mr.Patel for the
applicants has been vehemently objected by learned Assistant
Government Pleader Mr.Bharat Vyas contending that no
reason much less sufficient reason could be pleaded or argued
by the learned advocate for the applicant to condone huge
delay of 5243 days and, therefore, he prays to dimsiss the
present application.
5. Having heard learned advocates for both the sides and
having gone through the records, it appears that deceased
Page 2 of 4
Uploaded by MISHRA AMIT V.(HC00187) on Mon Apr 20 2026 Downloaded on : Mon May 18 18:30:47 IST 2026
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/153/2013 ORDER DATED: 20/04/2026
0.24243809371278902
appellant whose heirs are before this Court, had come to this
Court challenging the judgment and award passed by the
learned Reference Court along with other appellants and it is
joint appeal filed by as many as seven in numbers. Admittedly,
out of seven appellants, appellant nos.2 and 3 have expired.
Learned advocate Mr.Patel submitted that as far as deceased
appellant no.2 viz. Bhakunvarbaa Bharatsinh Jadeja is
concerned, her heirs are already on record and, therefore,
there is no need to bring her heirs on record, however, he
submitted that appellant no.3 survived by co-heirs and legal
representatives for the proper adjudication and as such in the
first appeal heirs and legal representatives of deceased
appellant no.3 are required to be brought on record.
6. Ordinarily, this Court would have denied to bring on
record of deceased appellant no.3 a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.