Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Sunita Agarwal, CJ, D.N. Ray, J
Puranraj Ganpatraj Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural context for the challenge against revenue entry cancellation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. validation of lower court findings regarding mutation entry cancellations and violation of tenancy act section 63. (Para 4 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. appellant's challenges regarding jurisdiction, limitation, and status of agriculturist. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 15 , 18 , 21) |
| 4. scope and authority of revenue officers under the land revenue code. (Para 16 , 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. reasoning regarding the timeline of revisional proceedings and evidence for agriculturist status. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. revenue entries as fiscal records not conferring substantive title or rights. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)
1. Heard Mr. Ashish H. Shah, the learned advocate for the appellant and perused the record.
2. This intra-court appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 10.02.2026 passed by the learned single Judge in dismissing the writ petition challenging the orders passed by the revenue authorities in canceling the mutation entry No.2796 effected on 04.12.1987, certified on 07.01.1988 and the su
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
