SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 17831

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO
PARTNER AND ADMINITRATOR OF RAJ CORPORATION RAMESHBHAI JIVRAMBHAI DESAIV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
R/CR.A/924/2025



##PAGE1##

NEUTRAL CITATION

Modification of IA Order dtd.

R/CR.A/924/2025 2 3 / 0 4 / 2 0 2 6 i n R / C R . A / 9 2 4 / 2 0 2 I5A ORDER DATED: 04/05/2026

0.8358675643108217

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

[On note for speaking to minutes of order dated 23/04/2026 in

R/CR.A/924/2025 ]

CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR DIRECTION) NO. 1 of 2026

In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 924 of 2025

========================================================

HITENDRA UGALCHAND GADHECHA (OWNER OF H. KUMAR GEMS

INCORPORATION)

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

========================================================

Appearance:

MR JEET B KARIA(11991) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1

MR JIGAR G GADHAVI(5613) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1

========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO

Date : 04/05/2026

IA ORDER

1. Speaking to Minutes is allowed.

2. In Para – 3 of the order dated 23.04.2026, the words

mentioned as “It is further noted that the applicant has furnished

surety under Section 437-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure in

compliance with the order passed by the learned Trial Court.”

are replaced with the words “The applicant was directed to

furnish surety under Section 437-A of the Code of Criminal

Procedure in compliance with the order passed by the learned

Trial Court.”.

Page 1 of 2

Uploaded by F.S. KAZI(HC01075) on Mon May 04 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Jun 06 00:48:17 IST 2026

##PAGE2##

NEUTRAL CITATION

Modification of IA Order dtd.

R/CR.A/924/2025 2 3 / 0 4 / 2 0 2 6 i n R / C R . A / 9 2 4 / 2 0 2 I5A ORDER DATED: 04/05/2026

0.8358675643108217

3. Rest of the order shall remain as it is.

4. Registry to issue fresh writ accordingly.

5. Speaking to Minutes stands disposed of.

(S. V. PINTO,J)

F.S.KAZI

Page 2 of 2

Uploaded by F.S. KAZI(HC01075) on Mon May 04 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Jun 06 00:48:17 IST 2026

##PAGE3##

NEUTRAL CITATION

Present IA Order is modified vide

R/CR.A/924/2025 I A O r d e r d t d . 0 4 / 0 5 / 2 0 2 6 i n IA ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

R/CR.A/924/2025

0.8358675643108217

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR DIRECTION) NO. 1 of 2026

In

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 924 of 2025

========================================================

HITENDRA UGALCHAND GADHECHA (OWNER OF H. KUMAR GEMS

INCORPORATION)

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

========================================================

Appearance:

MR JEET B KARIA(11991) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1

MR JIGAR G GADHAVI(5613) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2

MR. ADITYA JADEJA, APP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1

========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO

Date : 23/04/2026

IA ORDER

1. Learned advocate Mr.Jeet B. Karia for the applicant

seeks permission to withdraw the present application with

liberty to file a fresh application before the Trial Court.

2. The applicant has filed the present application

seeking permission to withdraw an amount of Rs.25,000/-

deposited by him before the Court of the Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Mehsana, in connection with Criminal Case No. 7026

of 2009. The applicant had earlier preferred a common

application seeking refund of amounts deposited in 13 matters;

Page 1 of 4

Uploaded by F.S. KAZI(HC01075) on Tue Apr 28 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Jun 06 00:48:17 IST 2026

##PAGE4##

NEUTRAL CITATION

Present IA Order is modified vide

R/CR.A/924/2025 I A O r d e r d t d . 0 4 / 0 5 / 2 0 2 6 i n IA ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

R/CR.A/924/2025

0.8358675643108217

however, by order dated 17.12.2025, the learned Trial Court

disposed of the said application, observing that since the

appeals were pending before this Court, refund of the

deposited amounts would not be appropriate, and further on the

ground that a single application had been filed for multiple

matters.

3. As per the record, the amount in question was

deposited during the pendency of the proceedings when a non-

bailable warrant had been issued, and the applicant was

released on bail on 19.01.2022. Thereafter, upon conclusion of

the trial, the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top