Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
P. M. Raval, J
Hareshbhai Samabhai Koli – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural compliance for bail application hearing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. overview of conviction and sentencing details. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. criteria for suspension of sentence during appeal. (Para 6) |
| 4. final order granting bail with specific conditions. (Para 7) |
ORAL ORDER
ORDER IN CRIMINAL APPEAL.
Admit.
ORDER IN CR.M.A.
1. Rule fixed forthwith. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent – State.
2. Though served, none appears for Respondent No.2.
3. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.
4. The original accused No.1 – applicant No.1 has been
convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years for the offence punishable under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, and in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of three months. The applicant has also been sentenced to undergo one year simple imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 294(B) read with Section 114 of the IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, and in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. The applicant has further been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
