IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M. R. Mengdey, J
Pradip @ Monu Arunkumar Chotelal Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of bail proceedings (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. conflicting arguments presented by parties (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. factors evaluating bail merit (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. bail granted with conditional stipulations (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER
1. The applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11191024250315 of 2025 registered with Ramol Police Station, District: Ahmedabad City for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 189(2), 189(4), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 324(6), 296(b) and 351(3) of the B.N.S and Section 135(1) of the G. P. Act.
2. Heard learned advocate appearing for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent – State.
2.1 Rule. Learned PP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
3. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.