Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Sanjeev J. Thaker, J
Nileshbhai Dineshbhai Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of anticipatory bail proceedings under bnss. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. conflicting contentions regarding custodial interrogation vs personal liberty. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. application of judicial discretion guided by settled supreme court precedents. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. grant of anticipatory bail subject to conditions and investigative cooperation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNSS”), the applicant has prayed for anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11204026260270 of 2026, registered with Kapadwanj Town Police Station, District: Kheda for the offences punishable under Sections 64(2)(m), 308(2), 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 54 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .
2. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule for respondent – State of Gujarat.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the nature of allegations are such that custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. It is further submitted that the applicant will keep himself available during the course of investigation and trial
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
