IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
D.S. CREDIT COOP. SOCIETY LTD. THROUGH AJAY SHIVKUMAR MISHRAV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
R/CR.A/1973/2022
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.A/1973/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 10/07/2026
0.8365432690504432
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (AGAINST ACQUITTAL) NO. 1973 of 2022
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
==========================================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No
==========================================================
D.S. CREDIT COOP. SOCIETY LTD. THROUGH AJAY SHIVKUMAR
MISHRA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. ASHOK L. CHAUHAN(14049) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR. NILAY THAKOR(14166) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
AAKASH D MODI(7449) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
BAILABLE WARRANT SERVED for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
MR UT MISHRA(3605) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
MS JYOTI BHATT ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M.
PRACHCHHAK
Date : 10/07/2026
JUDGMENT
1. The present appeal is filed by the appellant – original
complainant under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973
(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’ for short) / under Section 419 of
the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to
as ‘BNSS’ for short) against the judgment and order dated 05.08.2022
passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Court
No.31, Ahmedabad (hereinafter be referred to as “the Trial Court),
whereby the learned trial Court had acquitted the respondent/s -
Page 1 of 6
Uploaded by ANUSRI VASU(HC02352) on Fri Jul 10 2026 Downloaded on : Fri Jul 10 23:21:03 IST 2026
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.A/1973/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 10/07/2026
0.8365432690504432
accused for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’ for
short).
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent – State of
Gujarat and learned counsel for the respondent/s - accused have
submitted that this matter is required to be transferred in view of the
recent decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of
Celestium Financial Vs. A.Gnanasekaran Etc. reported in 2025
(3) GLH 747 wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the
original complainant to be considered as a victim of the offence under
Section 138 of the Act and, therefore, the complainant has right to file
an appeal under Section 372 of the Code before the lower Appellate
Court i.e. immediate Sessions Court before the District and the
judgment dated 22.12.2025 rendered in Criminal Misc. Application
No.12753 of 2019 with Criminal Misc. Application No. 12908 of 2019.
4. Before entering into the merits of this case, this Court deems it
proper to refer to the decision rendered by this Court in the case of
Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki Vs. State of Gujarat being Criminal
Miscellaneous Application Nos. 12753 of 2019 with 12908 of 2019 and
the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Celestium
Financial Vs. A. Gyanasekaran (supra) wherein the Hon’ble
Supreme Court has observed and held that the complainant, in a
complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, considered to be a victim,
has a specific right to file an appeal against the order of acquittal
under Section 372 of the Code / Section 413 of the BNSS to the Court
which is immediately superior in hierarchy i.e. the Sessions Court.
Page 2 of 6
Uploaded by ANUSRI VASU(HC02352) on Fri Jul 10 2026 Downloaded on : Fri Jul 10 23:21:03 IST 2026
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.A/1973/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 10/07/2026
0.8365432690504432
5. In view of the above, learned counsel for respondent - accused
submits that let the matter be remanded back to the concerned
Sessions Court.
6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has pointed out that the
matter in the case of Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gyanasekaran
(supra) is now pending at large before the Hon’ble Suprem
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.