SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 21000

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Hasmukh D. Suthar, J
NILESHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI PARMARV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
R/CR.MA/15219/2026 | R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 15219 of 2026



Important Points

The filing of a charge-sheet does not automatically entitle an accused to bail in grave offences, especially where the accused is the principal offender and there is a reasonable apprehension of tampering with evidence.

Subject

Criminal Law - Bail

Act Referred

Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: S.483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: S.103(1), S.238, S.54

Headnote

The application was filed under S. 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for regular bail in connection with offences punishable under S. 103(1), 238, and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The facts reveal that the applicant allegedly murdered a woman with whom he had an illicit relationship to prevent her from becoming an "impediment to his married life," subsequently shifting the body to a highway to "portray the incident as a road accident" (Para 4, 7). The court found that the applicant was the principal accused who executed a "calculated move" to conceal the crime (Para 9). The primary issue was whether the applicant was entitled to bail following the filing of the charge-sheet and whether parity with co-accused applied. The court reasoned that the principle of parity is not attracted because the roles of the co-accused were "limited merely to facilitating the use of the vehicle and assisting in shifting the dead body," whereas the applicant was the "principal accused who held the motive and directly caused the death" (Para 11). Furthermore, the court held that the "filing of the charge-sheet does not in any manner lessen the allegations made by the prosecution" (Para 14). Accordingly, the present application fails and is hereby dismissed.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Anmol D Ganwani
For the Respondents: Aditya Jadeja

Table of Content
1. bail application and opposing contentions regarding innocence and gravity of offence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. legal factors for bail and factual analysis of the accused's role in the crime. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. denial of bail based on principal role, risk of tampering, and irrelevance of charge-sheet filing. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. judicial precedents on bail factors and the non-absolute nature of liberty. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
5. dismissal of bail application and directions for expedited trial. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)

ORDER

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR C.R. No.11204067260069 of 2026 registered with Sevaliya Police Station, Kheda for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 238 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”).

3. The learned Advocate for the present applicant submitted that the applicant has no connection whatsoever with the alleged offence and has been falsely implicated. It was further submitted that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take considerable time and that the applicant has no criminal antecedents. On these grounds, it was prayed that the present application be allowed.

4. Per contra, the learned APP vehemently opposed the application, contending that the applicant is the principal accused and had developed an illicit relationship with the deceased. It was submitted that, apprehending that the deceased would become an impediment to his married life, the applicant caused her death. The applicant and the deceased allegedly used to meet at secluded places during the wee hours, and after committing the offence, the applicant, with the assistance of the co-accused, shifted the dead body to the highway in an attempt to portray the incident as a road accident. It was further submitted that, if released on bail, the applicant is likely to influence the witnesses and that the mere filing of the charge-sheet is not a ground for grant of bail. The co-accused, whose role was confined to assisting in shifting the dead body, have been enlarged on bail; therefore, the applicant cannot claim parity with them. Accordingly, it was prayed that the application be dismissed.

5. Heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and perused the investigation papers.

6. While deciding bail application, the Court has to consider the involvement of the accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be taken into consideration while considering an application for bail:

(i) the nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of the materials relied upon by the prosecution;

(ii) reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the witnesses;

(iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence;

(iv) character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances which are peculiar to the accused;

(v) larger interest of the public or the State and similar other considerations are required to be considered.

7. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and having perused the documents on record, it appears that the complaint has been filed by the complainant, who is the sister of the deceased. Although the deceased was married, her husband was unemployed and habituated to alcohol. Owing to his unemployment and inability to provide for her needs, the deceased came into contact with the present applicant, who was a friend of her husband. Although the present applicant was married, he fell in love with the deceased, and she allege

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top