2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 21406
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
SHIRISHBHAI ASHOKBHAI GARANGEV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
R/CR.MA/12670/2026
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/12670/2026 ORDER DATED: 08/07/2026
0.7520593321462766
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 12670
of 2026
With
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 12891 of 2026
==========================================================
SHIRISHBHAI ASHOKBHAI GARANGE
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ANAND BRAHMBHATT(6096) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR KISHAN N BRAHMBHATT(11382) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR MAUNISH T PATHAK(5892) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR. NIRAJ SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
SUNIL H PRAJAPATI(8350) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 08/07/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. The narrative unfolding from the FIR and,
specifically, the suicide note, presents a deeply troubling
picture that transcends a routine financial dispute. Prima
facie the available material suggests the applicant went far
beyond a demand for loan repayment, allegedly subjecting the
deceased to persistent intimidation, humiliation, and
psychological coercion. The threat to force the deceased's wife
into prostitution directly assaults the core dignity, honor, and
sanctity of the family unit. Such a threat, if verified prima
facie is inherently capable of destabilizing the mental
equilibrium of any ordinary individual and plunging them
into absolute despair. Because personal self-respect and the
Page 1 of 15
Uploaded by ADITYA SINGH(HC02376) on Fri Jul 10 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Jul 11 11:53:26 IST 2026
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/12670/2026 ORDER DATED: 08/07/2026
0.7520593321462766
protection of a spouse's honor are foundational societal values,
a severe onslaught on these principles through such
degrading intimidation cannot be treated lightly by the Court.
1.1 The present case arises out of the suicide
committed by the deceased, who, prior, to taking the extreme
step, allegedly left behind a suicide note specifically naming
the present applicants and holding them responsible for the
circumstances that purportedly drove the deceased to commit
suicide, and there is also a dying declaration of the deceased
taken before the Police wherein the deceased has named the
accused.
2. By way of this application under Section 482 of
the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short,
“BNSS”), the applicant has prayed for anticipatory bail in the
event of arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.
11191040261125 of 2026, registered with Sardarnagar Police
Station, District: Ahmedabad City for the offences punishable
under Sections 108, 351(2) and 54of the BNS and Sections 33
and 40 of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act.
2.1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent-State.
3. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and
learned APP for respondent – State of Gujarat.
Page 2 of 15
Uploaded by ADITYA SINGH(HC02376) on Fri Jul 10 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Jul 11 11:53:26 IST 2026
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/12670/2026 ORDER DATED: 08/07/2026
0.7520593321462766
4. The learned advocate for the applicant has mainly
argued that, considering the facts of the present case, that
the FIR was lodged after the delay of four days, which raises
a serious doubt regarding its credibility and spontaneity. It is
further argued that the entire case of the complainant is
that the applicant was demanding the repayment of a loan,
coupled with harassment which drove him to commit suicide.
It is the case of the applicant that the present applicant was
not present at the time when the deceased had committed
suicide.
4.1. It has also been argued that there is no direct or
indirect role attributed to the present applicant in the FIR,
and the allegations are false and frivolous. It is contended
that the ingredients of the alleged sections stated in the FIR
are not made out, as the allegations merely pertain to a
demand for repayment of loan which cannot constitute
abetment to su