Back
Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J
Gobind Agarwal & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute arises from alleged failure to execute a sale agreement. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. defense argues civil nature of allegations. (Para 5) |
| 3. absence of concrete evidence supporting offsetting pay claim. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. court emphasizes civil disputes cannot disguise as criminal offenses. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 5. charge-sheet proceedings quashed based on established legal principles. (Para 15) |
1. The instant revisional application has been filed for quashing of the impugned proceedings being Charge-Sheet No. 382 of 2012 dated 31.10.2012 under Sections 403 /406/417/442/34 of the Indian Penal Code arising out of Malipanchghara Police Station Case No. 286 of 2012 dated 21.08.2012 under Sections 403 /406/417/442/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending before Learned Judicial Magistrate, 5th Court, Howrah being G.R. Case No. 5555 of 2012. 2. Petitioners stated that one Sukhendu Ghosh a tenant at premises no. 9 Akshay Kumar Chatterjee Lane filed an application under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Howrah inter alia stating the petitioner no. 1 to 3 to be the partners of Partnership firm namely “Balaj
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
