SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 1302

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
Sandeep Sharma, J
MAMTA – Appellant
Versus
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUM COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER – Respondent
ARB.C/19/2025



Petitioner Advocates:Varun Rana Suneet Verma ,Respondent Advocate: AG Shreya Chauhan

The court upheld the interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, directing the deposit of assessed work value pending arbitration proceedings.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9 - Interim measures - Petition for preservation of work site and construction materials, joint measurement of work, and stay of re-tendering process - Court appointed Local Commissioner to assess work done - Amount of Rs. 29,74,422/- quantified for deposit pending arbitration proceedings. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Arbitration agreement - Parties agreed to refer disputes to arbitration - Dispute arose due to respondents re-advertising work without measuring completed work. (Paras 1-2)

(C) Interim measures - Court directed deposit of assessed amount pending arbitration, emphasizing that disputes regarding work completion are to be resolved by the Arbitrator. (Paras 3-4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was awarded a contract for construction work, but disputes arose regarding the progress of work, leading to the respondents initiating re-tendering without measuring the work done.

Findings of Court:
The Local Commissioner reported that work completed by the petitioner was valued at Rs. 29,74,422/-.

Issues: The main issues included the validity of the re-tendering process and the amount payable for work completed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the Local Commissioner’s assessment of work done should be respected, and the respondents were directed to deposit the assessed amount pending arbitration.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions to deposit the quantified amount.

Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

By way of instant petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, petitioner has made following prayers:

“a. Directing the respondents, preservation of the site of work and the construction material stacked at site which is subject matter of the arbitration agreement.

b. Directing the respondents to measure the work executed till date by the petitioner at the site of work and further directing the respondents to deposit with the registry of this Hon’ble Court and secure the amount payable on account of work executed and also, for the construction material stacked at site. c.Directing the respondents to undertake joint measurement/inspection of the site to determine the amount payable ton account of the work executed and the construction material stacked at site.

d. Directing the stay of re-tendering process initiated vide Annexure P-13.

e. Quash and set aside the re-tendering process initiated vide Annexure P-13 being illegal without cancelling the tender allotted to the present petitioner vide Annexure P-1 and further directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue and complete the work.

f. Any further relief, which this Hon’ble Court deemed fit under Section 9 (e) of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, in view of the facts and circumstances of the present case may kindly be granted/passed in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents, in the interest of law and justice.”

2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record are that parties to lis entered into arbitration agreement for the work of “Construction of Primary health Centre Building at Saichu (Sh:- Building Portion along with water supply and sanitary installations of rain water harvesting etc”. Vide afore agreement, parties agreed to refer all disputes arising out of or pertaining to the contract agreement for adjudication through arbitration. Vide award letter dated 19.5.2014, afore work was awarded to the petitioner for a price of Rs. 52,22,121/- . Time stipulation for completion of work was one year to be reckoned from 15 days after the date of issuance of award letter (Annexure P-1). Though petitioner claims to have started the work well within time, but since progress on the spot was not as per agreed terms, dispute arose inter-se parties. Respondents without cancelling the contract awarded in favour of the petitioner proceeded to re- advertise the work. Since work in question came to be awarded to third party without measuring the work already done by the petitioner on the spot, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings praying therein for reliefs as reproduced herein above.

2. Alongwith aforesaid petition, petitioner also filed OMP No. 452 of 2023, praying therein for appointment of Local Commissioner in terms of Section 9 (2) of the Act, for measurement of the work already done by the petitioner. This Court having taken note of the averments contained in the application as well as documents annexed therewith, passed order dated 29.9.2023, thereby appointing Local Commissioner with a direction to visit the spot and measure the work.

3. Pursuant to direction issued by this Court, Local Commissioner submitted her report. As per report of Local Commissioner, work found to have been completed on spot by the petitioner was to the tune of Rs. 29,74,422/-. Though by way of filing objections to the Local Commissioner report, respondents have disputed the aforesaid amount, but since it is not in dispute that after filing of the case at hand, petitioner also filed petition under Section 11 of the Act for appointment of the Arbitrator and the Hon’ble Chief Justice vide order dated 30.12.2023, appointed Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute inter-se parties, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings. Since Section 9 (II) (b) provides for interim measure of protection in respect of any of the matters as detailed in clause (9) (II) (a) to (e) and this court v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top