Back
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J
CHET RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail petition filed regarding alleged drug possession. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. evidence corroborates involvement of the petitioner. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of reasonable belief for bail application. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. petition denied based on lack of reasonable grounds. (Para 8) |
ORDER
By way of this petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , the petitioner has prayed for his release in FIR No. 336/20, dated 07.11.2020, registered at Police Station Kullu, in terms whereof, the petitioner is being prosecuted for commission of an offence punishable under Sections 20 & 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.
2. Mr. N.K. Tomar, learned counsel for the pet itioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and he has no connection whatsoever with the other accus ed in the case and, therefore, the petitioner deserves to be released on bail. He contends that the petitioner is an agriculturist by profession, who otherwise also is not involved in the commission of such kind of matters and he has been falsely implicated in the case at the behest of Police. He further states that the petitioner has no past crim
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
