SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(HP) 753

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
RAKESH KAINTHLA, J.
SAVITRI NEGI – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN SINGH – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Mehar Chand ,Respondent Advocate: Anu Tuli Harish Kashyap

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The present revisions are directed against the order dated 01.09.2021, vide which the application for maintenance filed by the wife was allowed and the husband was directed to pay maintenance @ ₹5,000/- per month to the wife from the date of the filing of the petition. (Parties shall be referred hereinafter to as their respective status).

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petitions are that the wife and her children filed a petition under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. for grant of maintenance. It was asserted that marriage between the husband and wife was solemnized in the year 1987. Three children (petitioners No.2 to 4) were born to the parties. The husband expected a male issue but when three daughters were born, he started quarrelling with his wife and beating her. He demanded ₹5,00,000/- from his wife. He said that he had taken a loan from Smt. Meera. When the wife was unable to meet the demand, the husband turned her and her children out of his home. The husband opened the lock of the door with the intervention of relatives and respectable persons of the society and gave only two rooms to the wife and her children in the house. The husband

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top