2024 Supreme(Online)(HP) 3792
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
GOPAL RAWAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER – Respondent
CRMMO/345/2024
The court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings, even in non-compoundable cases, where the parties have amicably settled the matter.
Headnote:
Quashing - Criminal Proceedings - Sections 419, 468, 500 IPC - Compromise between Parties
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 70/2023 registered under Sections 419, 468 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code. The dispute between the parties was amicably settled through a compromise.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through a compromise. The court also noted that Sections 419 and 500 IPC are compoundable, while Section 468 IPC is not compoundable. However, the court held that it has the inherent power to quash the criminal proceedings even in non-compoundable cases where the parties have amicably settled the matter.
Issues: Whether the FIR and consequent proceedings should be quashed in view of the compromise between the parties?
Ratio Decidendi: The court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings, even in non-compoundable cases, where the parties have amicably settled the matter and continuing the proceedings would result in an abuse of the process of the court and not secure the ends of justice.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and quashed FIR No. 70/2023 under Sections 419, 468 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code, as well as the consequent proceedings.
By way of instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, a prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner
for quashing of FIR No. 70/2023 dated 22.07.2023 under Sections 419,
468 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station
Padhar, District Mandi, H.P, as well as consequent proceedings arising
out of the same.
2.
The averments contained in the petition, which is duly
supported
by
an
affidavit
reveals
that
on
22.07.2023
complainant/respondent No.2 had got a FIR registered against the
present petitioner under Sections 419, 468 and 500 of the Indian Penal
Code. However, during the pendency of proceedings the dispute inter se
parties has been settled amicably vide compromise dated 25.04.2024,
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
copy whereof is appended along with the present petition as
Annexure P2.
3.
Statement of complainant/respondent No.2 stands recorded.
He has categorically stated that he has entered into compromise of his
own free will, volition and without any pressure. According to the
complainant/respondent No.2, the dispute inter se parties stands
amicably settled between the parties.
4.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record carefully.
5.
This Court sees no impediment in quashing the FIR in issue, as
the dispute inter se the parties stand amicably resolved.
6.
From a perusal of Section 320 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, it is evident that in so far as Sections 419 and 500 of the
Indian Penal Code are concerned, the same are compoundable.
However, Section 468 of the IPC is not compoundable.
7.
In this respect, attention of this Court has been drawn to case
titled Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another
reported as (2014) 6 Supreme Court Cases, 466, wherein the Apex
Court has categorically laid down that the High Court has inherent power
to quash the criminal proceedings even in those cases, which are not
compoundable, where the parties have amicably settled the matter inter
se them. However, this power is to be exercised sparingly and with
caution, in cases where settlement is arrived at. The guiding factors
being securing the ends of justice or to prevent an abuse of the process
of any Court.
8.
In view of the fact that the parties have entered into
compromise permitting the proceedings in pursuance to the aforesaid FIR
sought to be quashed to continue would only result into an abuse of
process and the same would not secure the ends of justice.
9.
Accordingly, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 70/2023 dated
22.07.2023 under Sections 419, 468 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code
registered at Police Station Padhar, District Mandi, H.P, as well as
consequent proceedings arising out of the same are also quashed.
10.
The petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the
pending application(s), if any.