Back
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
P. S. Rana, J
Smt. Reeta Gupta wd/o Sh. Ram Parshad and others – Appellant
Versus
Sh. Lal Chand and others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the rent dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding clerical errors and authority to correct. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's observations on legal principles of correction. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 4. exploration of appellate court's ability to amend clerical errors. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. final judicial decision on the revision petition. (Para 9) |
Order:
Present civil revision petition is filed under Section 24(5) of H. P. Urban Rent Control Act 1987 against the interim order dated 24.02.2016 whereby learned Appellate Authority (I) Kangra at Dharamshala (H.P.) remanded the rent petition to learned Rent Controller(I) Kangra at Dharamshala (H.P.) for limited purpose to correct clerical mistake in
Brief facts of the case:
2. Sh. Lal Chand s/o Sh. Tulsi Ram landlord filed eviction petition against tenants under Section 14(3)(C) of H. P. Urban Rent Control Act 1987. During pendency of rent petition before learned Rent Controller(I) Kangra at Dharamshala (H.P.) Sh. Ram Chand Mehta co-respondent No.4 died and learned Rent Controller impleaded Smt.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
