SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(HP) 11078

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA
KANSHI RAM THROUGH HIS LR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF H.P. – Respondent


judgment?

Reference Petition Nos. 28/4 of 2013, 29/4 of 2013, 30/4 of 2013 and 31/4 of 2013.

2. The total land measuring 11-07-00 bighas was proposed to be acquired by the State Government for construction of link road “Namhol-Bahadurpur” in village Tipra, District Bilaspur.Notification dated 25.11.2009 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act was published in Rajpatra dated 3.12.2009. Land Acquisition Collector vide award No. 14 of 2011 dated 9.12.2011 awarded the marked price ranging from Rs. 1,54,284/- to Rs. 7, 97,134/- per bigha, depending upon the classification of the land.

3. Aggrieved against the award passed by the Land Acquisition Collector, the claimants preferred Reference Petitions under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, which came to be registered as Reference Petition Nos. 28/4 of 2013, 29/4 of 2013, 30/4 of 2013 and 31/4 of 2013 before learned District Judge, Bilaspur. The reference Court re-determined the market value at the rate of Rs. 10,28,571/- per bigha, irrespective of the classification.

4. Aggrieved against the common judgment/award, passed by learned District Judge, Bilaspur dated 16.10.2015, the State has preferred RFA Nos. 305, 306, 307 and 308 of 

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top