SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(HP) 916

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA RSA No.162 of 2002-B a/w RSA No. 557 of 2001 Date of Decision: 29.04.2015

1. RSA No. 162 of 2002 Bhai Ashok Singh ..Appellant.

Versus Smt. Lalita & others ..Respondents.

2. RSA No. 557 of 2001 Rani Padamjit Singh & others ..Appellants.

Versus Shri Ashok Singh (cid:133)Respondent.

Coram:

The Hon(cid:146)ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1Yes.

For the Appellant(s): Mr. R.L. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Lall, Advocate, for the appellant in RSA No.162 of 2002 and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dheeraj K.

Vashista, Advocate, for the appellant in RSA No. 557 of

2001.

For the Respondents: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashista, Advocate, for the respondents in RSA No. 162 of 2002 and Mr. R.L. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Lall, Advocate, for the respondent in RSA No. 557 of

2001.

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

Sanjay Karol, J (oral)

In these appeals, filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, appellant(s) (in both the appeals) have assailed the findings of fact, some of which are concurrent, so returned by the Courts below. 2. Plai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top