IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 320/2016 Decided on:20.04.2024 Dina Nath (deceased) through LRs’ & Ors. …..Appellants Versus Bal Ram ......Respondent.

……………………………………………………………………………

Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellants : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate.

For the respondent : Mr. N.K. Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J The civil suit for possession of land instituted by the respondent has been concurrently decreed by both the learned Courts below. Aggrieved, the defendants (now substituted by legal heirs) have instituted this regular second appeal.

The parties hereinafter are being referred to according to their status before the learned Trial Court.

2. Facts

2(i) The plaintiff (respondent herein) instituted Civil Suit, on 09.08.2010, pleading therein that he was owner in possession of the

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes

suit land comprised in Khata Khatoni No.76/101 min, Khasra No.711/221 measuring 04-09-00 bighas situated at Mauza Shour, Pargna Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba. The defendants though strangers to the suit land