SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(HP) 7563

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 931 of 2022 Reserved on: 05.01.2023 Decided on: 07.01.2023 _______________________________________________________________

Vinod Kumar ......Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 Yes For the petitioner: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate.

For the respondents: Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr.

Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate Generals, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Prikshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3.

Satyen Vaidya, Judge.

By way of instant petition, a prayer has been made to quash FIR No.133 of 2015, dated 20.8.2015, registered at Police Station Sadar, Solan, District Solan, H.P. under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC and consequent criminal proceedings arising therefrom.

1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2. It is averred in the petition that late Sh. Jaskaran Bir Singh, predecessor-in-interest of respondents No. 2 and 3 had lodged an FIR No. 133 of 2015 against the petitioner at Police Station Sadar, Solan, H.P. After investigation, the challan was presented

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top