IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J
SITA RAM AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No.7876 of 2024 Decided on: 17.12.2024 _________________________________________________________________
Sita Ram and Anr. ………..Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others ….Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.
_________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Since despite utilization of land of the petitioners for the construction of road namely, Jabal to Jai Nagar via Ukhoo, no steps are being taken by the respondents for acquisition of their land and no compensation has been paid to them, petitioners are compelled to approach this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying therein for the following main relief:
“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this petition may kindly be allowed throughout wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.