IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J
AJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND OTHERS – Respondent
CWP No.940 of 2024 Decided on: 27.11.2024 _________________________________________________________________
Ajay Kumar ………..Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others ….Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?, [IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.]
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.
_________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Since despite utilization of land of the petitioner for the construction of road namely, Jabal to Jai Nagar via Ukhoo and Ukhoo to Kurmala, no steps are being taken by the respondents for acquisition of his land and no compensation has been paid to him, petitioner is compelled to approach this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying therein for the following main relief:
“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this petition may kindly be allowed through
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.