IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, ACJ, SATYEN VAIDYA,J
STATE OF HP AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
PHUNCHOG AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMP(M) No. 1321 and LPA No. 395 of 2024.
Date of Decision : 27 th November , 2024 .
State of H.P. & Ors. ...Applicants/Appellants.
Versus Phunchog & Ors. ....Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Appellants/Applicants(s): Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Sidharath Jalta, Deputy Advocate General.
For the respondent(s): Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral).
CMP(M) No. 1321 of 2024.
In view of the averments made in the application as also on account of non opposition thereto, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
LPA No. 396 of 2024
2. Notice. Mr. Maan Singh, learned counsel waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
3. Heard.
4. Aggrieved against the non payment of compensation by the appellants despite use of their land for construction of road, namely, Jong to Jaindi road, the respondents had filed CWP No. 4955 of 2023.
6. The appellants had contested the prayer of the respondents on the grounds that the claim of respondents was highly belated; t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.