IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA OMP(M) No. 25 of 2024 in Arb. Case No. 851 of 2024 Decided on: 22nd November, 2024.

_________________________________________________________________

Engineer-in-Chief & Ors. ....Applicants/Objectors Versus Dev Raj …Respondent _________________________________________________________________

Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, lWhether approved for reporting?

_________________________________________________________________

For the applicants: Mr.Y. P. S. Dhaulta and Mr. L. N.

Sharma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Sikandar Bhushan and Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocates General.

For the respondent: Mr. Suneet Goel, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Negi and Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocates.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Gist of the point involved in the lis is, in case the objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act in short) are preferred beyond l Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes three months-the period of limitation prescribed under Section 34(3) of the Act, but within the extendable period of thirty days in terms of proviso thereto, whether the objector is required