Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Sandeep Sharma, J
Shaheed Ashwani Kumar Chandel Filling Station, Berthi (Dharoti) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner filed case against new petrol outlet's noc. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments focus on guidelines violations. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondents argue noc is lawful, guidelines not applicable. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court considers competition and rights of oil companies. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. mandatory nature of guidelines remains undecided. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. court finds compliance with distance regulations. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. disputed intersection definitions and distances examined. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. petition dismissed; noc to remain effective. (Para 28) |
Sandeep Sharma, J.
Petitioner herein is aggrieved by the action of respondent No. 3 i.e. District Magistrate, Bilaspur, who allegedly, vide communication dated 16.1.2024, Annexure P-9, (colly) issued No Objection Certificate in favour of respondent No.4 i.e. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment (hereinafter, ‘BPCL’) for setting up MS/HSD retail outlet (Petrol Pump) over Khasra No. 2077/293, situate in Mohal Sunhani, Tehsil Jhandutta, District Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh in violation of guidelin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
