IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CMPMO No.558 of 2022 Decided on: 20.12.2024 __________________________________________________________

Jia Lal ...Petitioner Versus JayotiLal and Others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge

1Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner: Mr. P.K. Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate.

For the respondents: Mr. D.S. Nainta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.

Respondents No.3 to 7 were proceeded against ex-parte vide order dated 02.12.2022. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Petitioner-Jia Lal, being the plaintiff, has come up before this Court, seeking the following prayer:-

“It is therefore most respectfully prayed that the record of the case may kindly be called for, this petition may kindly be allowed, and the order dated 24.9.2022 passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Court No.1, Rohru in application No.172-6 of 2022 in Civil Suit No.104-1 of 2017 (14/2017) titled as JiaLal Versus JyotiLal vide which the right to lead evidence on behalf of the petitioner has been closed may kindly be quashed and set aside and the petitioner/plaintiff may kindly be afforded an opportunity to lead evidence, in the int