IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Bachitar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. demand for financial benefits related to service regularization. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. challenge to notional versus actual benefits granted. (Para 4) |
| 3. court directives leading to actual benefit claims. (Para 5 , 6) |
Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma and Mr.
Himanshu Kapila, Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, learned Counsel, accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard at this stage.
2. The petitioner has prayed for grant of actual benefits with effect from the date when his services were regularized retrospectively and has assailed the action of the respondents in releasing him notional benefits.
3. The case of the petitioner is that:-
3(i). Petitioner’s name was sponsored through Employment Exchange for the post of Driver. After holding proper interview, driving test and com
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.